Consolidated and inconclusive effects of additive manufacturing adoption: A systematic literature review

Franco, Denise; Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós; Santa-Eulalia, Luís Antonio de; Filho, Moacir Godinho

doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106713

Cited by 52 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 125 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…With respect to Additive Manufacturing, it plays an important role in the viability of a complex product. Together with the freedom of product design, the ability to customize and the variety of products are determining factors in the competitiveness of the Supply Chain [ 18 ]. The environmental impact, health, and safety seems to be contemplated in this technology that marks a trend in terms of resource consumption [ 16 , 18 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Together with the freedom of product design, the ability to customize and the variety of products are determining factors in the competitiveness of the Supply Chain [ 18 ]. The environmental impact, health, and safety seems to be contemplated in this technology that marks a trend in terms of resource consumption [ 16 , 18 ]. The impact of the technology on production strategy, technical requirements and distribution is still to be resolved [ 18 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The environmental impact, health, and safety seems to be contemplated in this technology that marks a trend in terms of resource consumption [ 16 , 18 ]. The impact of the technology on production strategy, technical requirements and distribution is still to be resolved [ 18 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is not the case with Additive Manufacturing, despite the fact that its adoption has many effects from the viability of a complex product, the freedom of design or the ability to mass customize, there are still contradictions with regard to the complexity and flexibility of the Supply Chain in addition to not being profitable in the automotive industry [ 18 ]. Just the opposite of the other two sectors.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Sustainability in the Aerospace, Naval, and Automotive Supply Chain 4.0: Descriptive Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The search for sustainability in the Supply Chain (SC) is one of the tasks that most concerns business leaders in all manufacturing sectors because of the importance that the Supply Chain has as a transversal tool and due to the leading role that it has been playing lately. Of all the manufacturing sectors, this study focuses on the aerospace, shipbuilding, and automotive sectors identified as transport. The present study carries out a descriptive review of existing publications in these three sectors in relation to the sustainability of the Supply Chain in its 4.0 adaptation as an update in matters that are in constant evolution. Among the results obtained, Lean practices are common to the three sectors, as well as different technologies focused on sustainability. Furthermore, the results show that the automotive sector is the one that makes the greatest contribution in this sense through collaborative programs that can be very useful to the other two sectors, thus benefiting from the consequent applicable advantages. Meanwhile, the Aerospace and Shipbuilding sectors do not seem to be working on promoting a sustainable culture in the management of the Supply Chain or on including training programs for their personnel in matters related to Industry 4.0.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Sustainability in the Aerospace, Naval, and Automotive Supply Chain 4.0: Descriptive Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The application of AM has evolved from prototypes to small-batches, but the objective of reaching mass production capabilities would require filling the gap between AM specification standards and the industrial needs [3]. In fact, the achievable quality is still affecting the adoption rate of AM in the consumer market [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Estimation and Improvement of the Achievable Tolerance Interval in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing through a Multi-State Machine Performance Perspective

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Dimensional quality is still a major concern in additive manufacturing (AM) processes and its improvement is key to closing the gap between prototype manufacturing and industrialized production. Mass production requires the full working space of the machine to be used, although this arrangement could lead to location-related differences in part quality. The present work proposes the application of a multi-state machine performance perspective to reduce the achievable tolerance intervals of features of linear size in material extrusion (MEX) processes. Considering aspecific dimensional parameter, the dispersion and location of the distribution of measured values between different states are analyzed to determine whether the production should be treated as single-state or multi-state. A design for additive manufacturing strategy then applies global or local size compensations to modify the 3D design file and reduce deviations between manufactured values and theoretical values. The variation in the achievable tolerance range before and after the optimization of design is evaluated by establishing a target machine performance index. This strategy has been applied to an external MEX-manufactured cylindrical surface in a case study. The results show that the multi-state perspective provides a better understanding of the sources of quality variability and allows for a significant reduction in the achievable tolerance interval. The proposed strategy could help to accelerate the industrial adoption of AM process by reducing differences in quality with respect to conventional processes.

show abstract

Industrialized Control and Automation System (ICAS)

Karthikeyan,

Dani Reagan Vivek,

Gopalakrishnan

et al. 2024

Knowledge Management and Industry Revolution 4.0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Consolidated and inconclusive effects of additive manufacturing adoption: A systematic literature review

Cited by 52 publications

References 125 publications

Sustainability in the Aerospace, Naval, and Automotive Supply Chain 4.0: Descriptive Review

Sustainability in the Aerospace, Naval, and Automotive Supply Chain 4.0: Descriptive Review

Estimation and Improvement of the Achievable Tolerance Interval in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing through a Multi-State Machine Performance Perspective

Industrialized Control and Automation System (ICAS)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About