2018
DOI: 10.3390/medsci6020044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation and Exacerbation of COPD

Abstract: Twenty percent of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients admitted to hospital because of an ‘exacerbation’ will have consolidation visible on a chest X-ray. The presence of consolidation is associated with higher mortality. Imperfect definitions of COPD exacerbation and pneumonia, and incomplete and imperfect diagnostic tests, have resulted in a debate about whether these episodes are best thought of as ‘exacerbation with consolidation’ or ‘pneumonia in a person with COPD’. With the current view… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58 Differentiating between these two events poses significant challenges. [58][59][60][61] Both hospitalization due to severe exacerbations and pneumonia have a profound impact on patient outcomes, supporting the idea that clinical trials should evaluate these events together as a composite outcome of hospitalized respiratory events, as recently reported for the IMPACT trial. 62 In that trial, triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI resulted in a significant 17% reduction in the risk of a severe exacerbation or hospitalized pneumonia compared with UMEC/VI (P=0.011).…”
Section: Benefit Versus Risk With Sittsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…58 Differentiating between these two events poses significant challenges. [58][59][60][61] Both hospitalization due to severe exacerbations and pneumonia have a profound impact on patient outcomes, supporting the idea that clinical trials should evaluate these events together as a composite outcome of hospitalized respiratory events, as recently reported for the IMPACT trial. 62 In that trial, triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI resulted in a significant 17% reduction in the risk of a severe exacerbation or hospitalized pneumonia compared with UMEC/VI (P=0.011).…”
Section: Benefit Versus Risk With Sittsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In the European COPD audit, it is notable that the presence of infiltrates was not associated with prior use of inhaled steroids. A similar 2014 UK COPD Audit found the same 19% rate of consolidation at the time of admission for exacerbation and again the risk of mortality in that group was higher than that in those without infiltrates (6.7% vs. 3.6%) ( 19 , 20 ). The presence of consolidation is also included in the Dyspnea, Eosinopenia, Consolidation, Acidemia, and Atrial Fibrillation (DECAF) prognostic scoring system for in-hospital mortality during exacerbations that has been prospectively validated ( 21 , 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, it is unsurprising that there is confusion as to what diagnostic label to use in hospitalised COPD patients with radiographic consolidation. This has resulted in the use of a number of different terms such as “pneumonic exacerbation of COPD”, “COPD exacerbation with consolidation”, “community-acquired pneumonia in a patient with COPD” and “COPD exacerbation and pneumonia”, none of which has been universally accepted [11, 15, 23]. Clinicians often make a diagnosis of acute exacerbation in COPD patients even when there is radiographic evidence of consolidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%