2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consolidation of use-dependent motor memories induced by passive movement training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To do this, we used a state-space model to interpret how motor adaptation is altered due to passive proprioceptive memory. Consistent with earlier work (Lei et al, 2016; Bao et al, 2017; Lei et al, 2017; Tays et al, 2020) we observed that passive training facilitated active motor adaptation. In each experimental group, the robot moved the arm passively in the direction that solved the upcoming rotation, but no visual feedback was provided.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To do this, we used a state-space model to interpret how motor adaptation is altered due to passive proprioceptive memory. Consistent with earlier work (Lei et al, 2016; Bao et al, 2017; Lei et al, 2017; Tays et al, 2020) we observed that passive training facilitated active motor adaptation. In each experimental group, the robot moved the arm passively in the direction that solved the upcoming rotation, but no visual feedback was provided.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, though this robotic intervention created proprioceptive errors during the passive period, the ultimate hand position provided the solution to the upcoming visual rotation. As in earlier studies, we observed that this manipulation facilitated active motor learning (Lei et al, 2016; Bao et al, 2017; Lei et al, 2017; Tays et al, 2020). When we applied a standard single-module state-space model to these data, the model predicted that improvements in learning were driven by changes in error sensitivity, not retention rates.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Cross-sensory exposure training involves either passively moving the unseen hand or using a force-channel that deviates its direction, while the cursor moves directly to a target. Despite minimizing the motor or efferent signals involved, this passive exposure to a discrepancy between seen and felt hand location leads to similar or smaller but significant reach aftereffects (Cressman & Henriques, 2010; Mostafa, ’t Hart, & Henriques, 2019; Ruttle, ’t Hart, & Henriques, 2018; Salomonczyk, Cressman, & Henriques, 2013) and can facilitate subsequent adaptation to the same perturbation in a classic visuomotor paradigm (Bao, Lei, & Wang, 2017; Sakamoto & Kondo, 2015; Tays, Bao, Javidialsaadi, & Wang, 2020). Not surprisingly, such training also leads to changes in hand localization, which are similar in size to those elicited when the reaches are self-generated during classical visuomotor adaptation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%