CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials

Grant, Sean; Mayo‐Wilson, Evan; Montgomery, Paul; Macdonald, Geraldine; Michie, Susan; Hopewell, Sally; Moher, David

doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2735-z

Cited by 239 publications

(178 citation statements)

References 112 publications

(158 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

173

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, Kiesler (1966) also pointed out the unreasonable assumption of uniform therapist outcomes. Not surprisingly, the reporting of clustering effects is part of the CONSORT statement for non-pharmacological treatments (Grant et al, 2018). Unfortunately, reviews show that investigators mostly do not report therapist effects, and worse, do not adjust their statistical analyses.…”

Section: Therapist Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for significant others of treatment-refusing problem gamblers: A randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Magnusson¹,

Nilsson²,

Andersson³

et al. 2019

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last couple of decades evidence-based psychotherapies have flourished, and there are now therapies that are well-established for a wide range of problems. At the same time the mental-health burden is still enormous, and challenges to the dissemination of treatments are substantial. Despite the considerable gains in knowledge that have been made, many issues remain unsolved, and there are many reasons to be skeptical of the current quality of the evidence.

show abstract

Section: Therapist Effectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for significant others of treatment-refusing problem gamblers: A randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Magnusson¹,

Nilsson²,

Andersson³

et al. 2019

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the three studies did not use the CONSORT checklist (Arruda et al, 2016;Bilgiç & Acaroğlu, 2017;Toccafondi et al, 2017). In future studies, suitable randomization and reporting using the CONSORT checklist will help minimize the risk of bias (Grant et al, 2018).…”

Section: 4 Standard Errormentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of music intervention on patients with cancer‐related pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Yangöz

Özer

2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To synthesize the effect of music intervention on patients with cancer‐related pain in randomized controlled trials. Design A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials following Cochrane methods. Data resources Systematic searches were conducted in Science Direct, Web of Science, Springer Link, Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations, Ovid, CINAHL, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Proquest, Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center, ULAKBIM Turkish National Databases for studies published in English and Turkish without year limitation. The review period covered 1978–March 2018. Review methods The risk of bias of eligible studies was evaluated by two researchers using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Results Six studies with 593 participants met the inclusion criteria. Music intervention was generally applied by the passive listening method, which ranged from 30–60 min and 1–3 sessions. No significant publication bias was found in the main outcomes. As a result of the meta‐analysis, it was found that music interventions have a moderate effect on cancer‐related pain. Conclusion Music intervention can have a positive effect on the management of cancer pain. The studies reported no adverse events. Nurses can use music intervention to manage cancer‐related pain. Impact The meta‐analysis addressed the effect of music intervention on cancer‐related pain. The statistical result indicates that music intervention was moderately effective in cancer‐related pain. The findings of this study will contribute to the application of effective music intervention by nurses and will provide guidance for the development of studies related to the effect of music intervention on cancer‐related pain.

show abstract

“…The Methods and Results sections followed the standards and guidelines established by CONSORT‐SPI Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Social and Psychological Trials …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parts greater than their sum: randomized controlled trial testing partitioned incentives to increase cancer screening

Nisa

Bélanger

Schumpe

2019

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Promoting healthy behavior is a challenge for public health officials, especially in the context of asking patients to participate in preventive cancer screenings. Small financial incentives are sometimes used, but there is a little scientific basis to support a compelling description of the best‐practice implementation of such incentives. We present a simple behavioral strategy based on mental accounting from prospect theory that maximizes the impact of incentives with no additional cost. We show how the partition of one incentive into two smaller incentives of equivalent total amount produces substantial behavioral changes, demonstrated in the context of colorectal cancer screening. In a randomized controlled trial, eligible patients aged 50−74 (n = 1652 patients) were allocated to receive either one €10 incentive (upon completion of screening) or two €5 incentives (at the beginning and at the end of screening). We show that cancer screening rates were dramatically increased by partitioning the financial incentive (61.1%), compared with a single installment at the end (41.4%). These results support the hedonic editing hypothesis from prospect theory, and underline the importance of implementing theoretically grounded healthcare interventions. Our results suggest that, when patient incentives are feasible, healthcare procedures should be framed as multistage events with smaller incentives offered at multiple points in time.

show abstract

CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials

Cited by 239 publications

References 112 publications

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for significant others of treatment-refusing problem gamblers: A randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for significant others of treatment-refusing problem gamblers: A randomized wait-list controlled trial.

The effect of music intervention on patients with cancer‐related pain: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Parts greater than their sum: randomized controlled trial testing partitioned incentives to increase cancer screening

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About