Consortia purchasing: a feasibility study for the UK veterinary and animal health field

Abstract

If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.Abstract ASVIN was a project funded by the Research Support for Libraries Programme (RSLP). The principal aim was to develop better co-operation between nine UK libraries in the veterinary and animal health field. The project examined a number of library related areas, such as journal archiving, collection development policies, development of a common Z39.50 catalogue interface, grey literature, electronic journals and consortia purchasing. This paper examines the latter issue, taking a brief look at the historical developments and exploring the reasons why libraries enter consortia. It then focuses on the effects upon collection development, models of consortia and describes the ASVIN experience. Electronic accessThe research register for this journal is available at

Library consortia in India with special reference to UGC-Infonet digital library consortium

“…She grouped them on the basis of their services, funding, management, governance structure and ownership of infrastructure, etc. According to Davies (2001) there are mainly three models of library consortia available in UK. Shachaf (2003) highlighted that as per type, consortia may be known as Academic, medical or public.…”

A survey study of the 2007 Chinese e‐books consortium

“…While the concept of cooperation among libraries is not new (Kopp, 1998), libraries did not apply it widely until the 1980s (Nfila and Darko‐Ampem, 2002). Various studies have discussed the effectiveness of different types of library consortia in various regions, such as Africa (Alemna and Antwi, 2002), the UK (Bley, 2000; Davies, 2001), South Africa (Darch et al , 1999), the USA (Dillon, 2001; Evans, 2002; Langston, 2003), Swaziland (Jalloh, 2000), and Queensland (Sayers, 2004), etc. Suppliers/publishers have increasingly sought to sell goods through library consortia because many libraries have joined consortia (Hurtt, 2000).…”