2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conspecific and interspecific stimuli reduce initial performance in an aversive learning task in honey bees (Apis mellifera)

Abstract: The purpose of this experiment was to investigate whether honey bees (Apis mellifera) are able to use social discriminative stimuli in a spatial aversive conditioning paradigm. We tested bees' ability to avoid shock in a shuttle box apparatus across multiple groups when either shock, or the absence of shock, was associated with a live hive mate, a dead hive mate, a live Polistes exclamans wasp or a dead wasp. Additionally, we used several control groups common to bee shuttle box research where shock was only a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Honeybees have olfaction behavior for their survival and food seeking. The seeking of food and water resources exposes honeybees to conspecific competition and predation, leading to learning behavior responses to smell, visual cues, specific locations and other relevant stimuli [8,9]. The olfactory learning behavior is more critical for the survival of the colony and seeking of nectar, pollen and water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeybees have olfaction behavior for their survival and food seeking. The seeking of food and water resources exposes honeybees to conspecific competition and predation, leading to learning behavior responses to smell, visual cues, specific locations and other relevant stimuli [8,9]. The olfactory learning behavior is more critical for the survival of the colony and seeking of nectar, pollen and water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is not a single concise definition of citizen science, it can typically be thought of as involving non-scientists in the scientific process. However, many of the most significant programs either engage with community members already scientifically literate or are much more goal-focused and thus do not necessarily improve understanding of the scientific method [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Therefore, effective community engagement and citizen science need to include both tentpole and smaller activities with community members that are underrepresented in the scientific process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%