Conspicuous work: Peer working time, labour supply, and happiness

Abstract

People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

Labor supply and the business cycle: The “bandwagon worker effect”

“…More precisely, this author analyses the significance of social effects in relation to working hours by using a sample of public workers in Germany between 1993 and 2005. Similarly, Collewet, de Grip, and de Koning (2017) point out that there is a small peer effect in the working time of a sample of Dutch male employees from 1994 to 2011. Similar results are in Weinberg, Reagan, and Yankow (2004).…”

Social Exchange Approach and Happiness at Work: Exploring the Mediating Effect of Organizational Commitment

“…According to Collewet et al (2017), social interactions in the organization are drivers of individual subjective well-being. As an example of these, teamwork can be seen in teamwork, shared value among members of the organization, group bonding, and acceptance among colleagues.…”

Peer Effects and Fertility Preferences in China: Evidence From the China Labor-Force Dynamics Survey

“…The effects of social networks (e.g., peer effects) on individual behaviors and outcomes are already amply documented in the contexts of work time (Collewet, 2015), education (Hanushek, Kain, Markman, & Rivkin, 2003), smoking (Ali & Dwyer, 2009), obesity (Gwozdz et al, 2019), fast food consumption (Fortin & Yazbeck, 2015), crime (Bayer, Hjalmarsson, & Pozen, 2009), financial decisions (Bursztyn, Ederer, Ferman, & Yuchtman, 2014), and agricultural revenue (Songsermsawas, Baylis, Chhatre, & Michelson, 2016). Theories of fertility change and social interactions are also placing greater emphasis on how networks shape childbearing-related norms and schema (Kohler, 2015), resulting in another strand of empirical research on how social networks affect fertility.…”