2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48971-0_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant Query Time $$(1+\epsilon )$$ -Approximate Distance Oracle for Planar Graphs

Abstract: We give a (1 + ǫ)-approximate distance oracle with O(1) query time for an undirected planar graph G with n vertices and non-negative edge lengths. For ǫ > 0 and any two vertices u and v in G, our oracle gives a distanced(u, v) with stretch (1 + ǫ) in O(1) time. The oracle has size O(n log n((log n)/ǫ + f (ǫ))) and pre-processing time O(n log n((log 3 n)/ǫ 2 + f (ǫ))), where f (ǫ) = 2 O(1/ǫ) . This is the first (1 + ǫ)-approximate distance oracle with O(1) query time independent of ǫ and the size and pre-proces… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of our oracles have Ω(log n) query and updates since we handle root-to-leaf paths in the decomposition tree. It would be interesting to study whether this can be avoided, as done in the vertex-tovertex case, where approximate distance oracles with faster query times exist (see e.g., [11,14,2] and references therein). Another interesting question that arises is that of faster dynamic prefix minimum data structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of our oracles have Ω(log n) query and updates since we handle root-to-leaf paths in the decomposition tree. It would be interesting to study whether this can be avoided, as done in the vertex-tovertex case, where approximate distance oracles with faster query times exist (see e.g., [11,14,2] and references therein). Another interesting question that arises is that of faster dynamic prefix minimum data structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many results reporting (1 + ε)approximate distances with various tradeoffs exist, all with (nearly) linear size and polylogarithmic, or even O(1/ε) query-time [23,15,14,26]. Gu and Xu [13] presented a size O(n polylog n) distance oracle capable of reporting (1 + ε)-approximate distances in time O(1). While their query time is a constant independent of ε, the preprocessing time and space are nearly linear, but with an exponential dependency on (1/ε).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A preliminary version of the paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 26th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2015)[8] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%