2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-020-05339-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant speed lines–curves—NURBS reference pulse IPOs (part I)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simplified state diagram computes one perfect major axis point and possibly a perfect nonmajor axis point. Table 4 of [1] indicates that the computation of one best point is not sufficient to generate the perfect 3D-line. The perfect 3D-lines and QSICs RMD algorithms use the simplified state diagram (Table 5) to generate the perfect 26-connected curves.…”
Section: The Simplified State Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The simplified state diagram computes one perfect major axis point and possibly a perfect nonmajor axis point. Table 4 of [1] indicates that the computation of one best point is not sufficient to generate the perfect 3D-line. The perfect 3D-lines and QSICs RMD algorithms use the simplified state diagram (Table 5) to generate the perfect 26-connected curves.…”
Section: The Simplified State Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated length equals LS= 2 Bresenham's algorithm B a is imperfect (due to the major axis algorithm and the projected 3Ddistance) and therefore its accuracy is 37% worse than the accuracy of the perfect IPO R a , but its execution speed is two times faster the RMD algorithm. NPULS equals 120 instead of 121 and the LN TAM [1] kcs TAN [ This small correction has no practical influence on the constant feedrate machining; therefore, the other examples give the small correction without comments.…”
Section: While Loop Of Bresenham's 3d-curve-ipomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations