2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2016.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constant versus variable markups: Implications for the law of one price

Abstract: This paper compares the implications of having constant versus variable markups on the Law of One Price (LOP) by decomposing the good-category level prices into marginal costs of production, markups, and trade costs. Using a trade model, it is shown that the case of constant markups corresponds to log-linear trade regressions, while the case of variable markups corresponds to lin-log trade regressions. Empirical results show that marginal costs of production contribute most to the deviations from LOP for both … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As is evident, after controlling for distance effects due to duties/tariffs and transportation costs, the effects of distance on trade due to preferences is positive during the 1990s, which is against most of the studies in the literature using distance as a proxy for such observed trade costs. However, this result is consistent with some other studies in the literature such as byYilmazkuday (2016b) who also focus on the effects of distance through the preference of consumers toward exotic products coming from distant countries. The distance elasticity estimates become mostly insignificant over time (starting from 2005), potentially due to free trade agreements such as NAFTA showing its effects (gradually starting from 1994) when the U.S. might have started importing more products from nearby NAFTA countries.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…As is evident, after controlling for distance effects due to duties/tariffs and transportation costs, the effects of distance on trade due to preferences is positive during the 1990s, which is against most of the studies in the literature using distance as a proxy for such observed trade costs. However, this result is consistent with some other studies in the literature such as byYilmazkuday (2016b) who also focus on the effects of distance through the preference of consumers toward exotic products coming from distant countries. The distance elasticity estimates become mostly insignificant over time (starting from 2005), potentially due to free trade agreements such as NAFTA showing its effects (gradually starting from 1994) when the U.S. might have started importing more products from nearby NAFTA countries.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…6 In this second methodology, we decompose the summation of the right hand side of the expression into its components. 7 All estimated g 's are signi…cant at the 10% level. The average R-squared values are about 0.54 and 0.16 for the …rst and the second stage of TSLS, respectively, where 0.54 is an indicator of strong instruments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…7 The decomposition of price dispersion for all goods is given in Figure 1 in levels and in Figure 2 in percentage terms when the …rst methodology is used for variance decomposition. 8 As is evident, the contribution of markups in the price dispersion are up to 85%, while the contribution of marginal costs are up to 100% across goods; the contribution of trade costs are again almost none in most cases (although there are few exceptions).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, price dispersion – namely, a homogeneous product being sold at different prices by different exporters – can emerge, for several reasons, such as entry barriers and geographical separation of markets (Krugman, 1991, Yang et al, 2017), different marginal costs (Crucini and Yilmazkuday, 2014, Yilmazkuday, 2016), variations in consumer preferences (Grebitus et al, 2013), and monetary illusion (Fehr and Tyran, 2001). 2 Following this branch of literature, we aim at testing the presence or not of LOP in the international food trade network ( IFTN ), extending the analysis to the price-formation mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%