Background: Social prescribing is gaining traction internationally. It is an approach which seeks to acknowledge and address some of the effects of the social determinants of health by signposting people to support available in their local communities. It is hoped that social prescribing might improve health inequities and reduce reliance on healthcare services. In the United Kingdom, social prescribing link workers have become core parts of primary care teams. Despite growing the literature on the implementation of social prescribing, to date there has been no synthesis that develops a theoretical understanding of the factors that shape link workers’ experiences of their role.
Methods: We undertook a meta-ethnographic evidence synthesis of qualitative literature to develop a novel conceptual framework that explains how link workers experience their roles. We identified eligible studies using a systematic search of key electronic databases, Google alerts, and through scanning reference lists of included studies. We followed the eMERGe guidance when conducting and reporting this meta-ethnography.
Results: Our synthesis included 21 studies and developed a “line of argument” or overarching conceptual framework which highlighted inherent interrelated and interacting tensions present at each of the levels that social prescribing operates. These tensions may arise from a mismatch between the policy logic of social prescribing and the material and structural reality, which is shaped by social, political, and economic forces, into which it is being implemented.
Conclusion: The tensions highlighted in our review may shape link workers’ experiences of their role. They may call into question the sustainability of social prescribing and the link worker role as currently implemented, as well as their ability to deliver desired outcomes such as improvement in health inequities or reductions in healthcare service utilisation. Greater consideration should be given to how the link worker role is defined, deployed, and trained. Furthermore, thought should be given to ensuring that the infrastructure into which social prescribing is being implemented into is sufficient to meet needs. Should social prescribing seek to improve outcomes for those experiencing social and economic disadvantage, it may be necessary for social prescribing models to allow for more intensive and longer-term modes of support.