Identities in South Asia 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429031953-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitution and conflict

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All levels of government in Nepal thus feature inclusiveness of some type in their structures and processes. The evolving empirical research on their efficacy, however, generates contentious evidence (Lawoti, 2008(Lawoti, , 2019, including some that are indicative of fostering exclusionary practices in Nepal (Acharya & Zafarullah, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All levels of government in Nepal thus feature inclusiveness of some type in their structures and processes. The evolving empirical research on their efficacy, however, generates contentious evidence (Lawoti, 2008(Lawoti, , 2019, including some that are indicative of fostering exclusionary practices in Nepal (Acharya & Zafarullah, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More succinctly, ethnic federalism has been defined as "a form of power sharing within a nation-state in which ethnically based regional sub-units are accorded a high degree of territorial autonomy" with the consideration that "when ethnic groups are more or less territorially concentrated, [...] the boundaries of sub-units can be drawn in such a way that each group, although a minority in the country as a whole, forms a local majority in at least one of the sub-units" (Turton, 2005, p.89). The literature on ethnic federalism usually focuses on case studies of specific countries including the former Yugoslavia, Ethiopia, Nepal, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Pakistan and South Sudan (Critchley, 1993;Lawoti, 2019;Denti, 2015;Khan, 2014;Zambakari, 2015). However, due to Ethiopia's unique approach to ethnic federalism, a great deal of the literature focuses on evaluating the case of Ethiopia specifically (Engedayehu, 1993;Vestal, 1999;Crummey, 2000;Nyong'o, 2002;Cohen, 2003;Mamdani, 2005;Walle, 2005;Aalen, 2006;Mengisteab, 2007).…”
Section: Ethnic Federalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More succinctly, ethnic federalism has been defined as "a form of power sharing within a nation-state in which ethnically based regional sub-units are accorded a high degree of territorial autonomy" with the consideration that "when ethnic groups are more or less territorially concentrated, [...] the boundaries of sub-units can be drawn in such a way that each group, although a minority in the country as a whole, forms a local majority in at least one of the sub-units" (Turton, 2005, p.89). The literature on ethnic federalism usually focuses on case studies of specific countries including the former Yugoslavia, Ethiopia, Nepal, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Pakistan and South Sudan (Critchley, 1993;Lawoti, 2019;Denti, 2015;Khan, 2014;Zambakari, 2015). However, due to Ethiopia's unique approach to ethnic federalism, a great deal of the literature focuses on evaluating the case of Ethiopia specifically (Engedayehu, 1993;Vestal, 1999;Crummey, 2000;Nyong'o, 2002;Cohen, 2003;Mamdani, 2005;Walle, 2005;Aalen, 2006;Mengisteab, 2007).…”
Section: Ethnic Federalismmentioning
confidence: 99%