1996
DOI: 10.1097/00008390-199612000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutional alterations in p16 in patients with uveal melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We cannot rule out misdetection of mutations by SSCP, but this seems unlikely, as we recently reported one of the highest rates of p16 INK4A germline mutation in CMM families, using the same technical approaches (Soufir et al, 1998). Our data enhance results of two previous studies: Wang et al did not find any pathogenic mutation in 13 UMM patients with a family history of melanoma, either uveal (n = 6), or cutaneous (n = 7) (Wang et al, 1996); Singh et al did not detect either any mutation in eight families with two members affected with UMM (Singh et al 1996c). All 30 UMM families studied worldwide up to now have in common an absence of mutation in p16 INK4A , therefore supporting the rare involvement of this gene in genetic predisposition to UMM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…We cannot rule out misdetection of mutations by SSCP, but this seems unlikely, as we recently reported one of the highest rates of p16 INK4A germline mutation in CMM families, using the same technical approaches (Soufir et al, 1998). Our data enhance results of two previous studies: Wang et al did not find any pathogenic mutation in 13 UMM patients with a family history of melanoma, either uveal (n = 6), or cutaneous (n = 7) (Wang et al, 1996); Singh et al did not detect either any mutation in eight families with two members affected with UMM (Singh et al 1996c). All 30 UMM families studied worldwide up to now have in common an absence of mutation in p16 INK4A , therefore supporting the rare involvement of this gene in genetic predisposition to UMM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Deleterious germline mutations of CDKN2A have also not been found in previous studies of familial [11,12,14] and sporadic [8,13] ocular melanoma cases and ocular melanoma cases with a family history of cutaneous melanoma [11,14]. There is, however, some evidence that a loss of CDKN2A function may play a role in ocular melanoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The search for candidate susceptibility genes has focused on those known to be associated with cutaneous melanoma, e.g. the cell cycle regulatory genes, CDKN2A [7] and CDK4 [8], and the melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R), a pigmentation-related gene [9,10], but no associations of germline mutations in these genes with ocular melanoma have been reported [8,[11][12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al 45 studied 13 patients with a family history of either uveal melanoma (n ϭ 7) or cutaneous melanomas (n ϭ 6). No pathogenic germline mutations in P16 INK4A were detected in any of the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%