Constitutional Spheres and Forms of Interaction among Chamber in Modern Parliaments

Nikonova, Ludmila I.; Markhgeym, Marina V.; Novikova, Alevtina E.; Minasyan, Anna; Kurova, Natalya N.

doi:10.5539/jpl.v10n4p201

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In Armenia, the National Assembly is elected according to the proportional election system (part 3 of article 89 in Chapter 4 "National Assembly"). This system is also characteristic of the election into the Zhogorku Kenesh in Kyrgyzstan (Article 70) (Nikonova, et al, 2017). Section IV, Article 51 "Parliament" of the Constitution of Kazakhstan determined that 9 deputies of the Mazhilis are elected by the Assembly of the People of Kazakhstan.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foreign Constitutional Guarantee of Voting Right

Troyan,

Kuznetsov,

Novikova

et al. 2022

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper presents the results of a comparative legal study of the texts from the constitutions belonging to the member countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States to identify guarantees of legal voting right in them. The study was built based on a dialectical approach to disclosing legal phenomena and processes using general scientific (systemic, logical, analysis, and synthesis) and particular scientific methods. Based on the classification method, the sought guarantees were identified, named, and characterized in the following varieties: constitutional sovereign, electoral constitutional with a subdivision into the material (general and particular) and procedural (restrictive and technical) types, and institutional guarantees implemented by special and constitutional control entities as well as standardizing constitutional types. Within this working framework, the authors present the results of the comparative study devoted to the constitutions of the CIS member states in connection with the identification of guarantees of legal voting right in them. So far, no such comparative study has been conducted to identify the securities of the right to vote in the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Foreign Constitutional Guarantee of Voting Right

Troyan,

Kuznetsov,

Novikova

et al. 2022

Int. J. Criminol. Sociol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It should be noted that the author's focus in the study of the parliaments of South American countries is focused on the consideration of the regional parliaments of Latin America (Mariano et al, 2017), on the analysis of parliament sites as the tools for interaction with civil society (Santiago et al, 2017), in connection with the use of social networks by parliaments as modern means of cooperation on the example of Latin America and European countries (Giraldo-Luque & Villegas-Simón, 2017), as well as in the context of their comparative study (Fasone, 2020). Let us clarify that we have already carried out a comparative analysis of constitutional spheres and forms of interaction between the chambers of parliaments of foreign countries (Nikonova et al, 2017) with their subsequent specification in certain regions (Dzybova et al, 2018;Minasyan et al, 2019). We emphasize that the study of the interaction between the chambers of parliament in the countries of South America within a research (scientific) format has not been carried out.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Public Interaction Fields of Parliament Chambers in the Countries of South America

Bezuglya

Afanasieva

Arzumanova

et al. 2021

Cimexus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este artículo presenta el análisis del autor de los textos constitucionales de los países sudamericanos sobre la consolidación de campos de interacción universal entre las cámaras de los parlamentos. En el transcurso del estudio, se encontró que los campos de interacción típicos (universales) entre las cámaras del parlamento están representados por el ámbito legislativo (implementado en el transcurso de la adopción de leyes, celebrando reuniones conjuntas en diversas ocasiones); ámbito organizativo y de personal (prevé la participación consolidada de las cámaras durante la formación de los poderes públicos, así como el nombramiento de los funcionarios); la esfera de control, que está representada por tres tipos: personal y control (relacionado con la implementación del procedimiento de acusación contra el jefe de Estado, renuncia de altos funcionarios del Estado, expresión de desconfianza en el gobierno), organizacional y de control (se refiere a la formación de comisiones conjuntas permanentes y temporales por las cámaras del parlamento) y control financiero (asume la participación consolidada de las cámaras para la aprobación del presupuesto estatal); el ámbito internacional (se refiere a las actividades conjuntas de las cámaras en el curso de la ratificación o denuncia de tratados internacionales, la declaración del estado de guerra o la concertación de la paz). Se concluye que las esferas típicas de interacción entre las cámaras parlamentarias en los países sudamericanos demuestran los enfoques del legislador para el desarrollo de la interacción entre las cámaras parlamentarias.

show abstract

“…It is worth mentioning that the constitutional texts of the studied group of countries with a bicameral structure of parliament provide for various forms of cooperation between the chambers (Nikonova et al, 2017). In the legal doctrine, the problems concerning the parliaments of African countries were developed in connection with the study of women's representation in parliaments (Bauer, 2012;Enaifoghe, 2019), in the context of consideration of regional parliamentary bodies of Africa (Jancic, 2019), and their influence on the basis of state policy in the field of gender equality (Nijzink et al, 2006), in the course of the analysis of decisions taken by African parliaments (Ertan, 2020), in the analysis of democratic foundations (Blaser Mapitsa et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Functional interaction between public bodies

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines the constitutional approaches accepted in the Central African countries regarding the formalization of interaction between the chambers of parliaments. The study found that all constitutional texts of the considered group of countries as a universal (typical) form of interaction between the chambers of parliament consolidate the adoption of legislative acts; joint meetings (on the taking of their oath by the heads of states or members of the Constitutional Court, making a decision on the introduction of a state of emergency or siege in the country, dismissing the head of state, appointing officials, etc.); the formation of joint commissions and supreme bodies of state power, and the appointment of officials. It was noted that despite the "constitutional equality" of the chambers in terms of introducing bills, financial bills are submitted exclusively to the lower chamber of parliament. The ratification of international treaties by the chambers of parliament (Gabon, Congo) is classified as an atypical (specific) form of interaction between the chambers of parliaments.

show abstract

Constitutional Spheres and Forms of Interaction among Chamber in Modern Parliaments

Cited by 3 publications

References 7 publications

Foreign Constitutional Guarantee of Voting Right

Foreign Constitutional Guarantee of Voting Right

Public Interaction Fields of Parliament Chambers in the Countries of South America

Functional interaction between public bodies

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About