Constitutionalism and Political Science: Imaginative Scholarship, Unimaginative Teaching

Graber, Mark A.

doi:10.1017/s1537592705050139

PPS

2005

DOI: 10.1017/s1537592705050139

|View full text |Cite

Constitutionalism and Political Science: Imaginative Scholarship, Unimaginative Teaching

Mark A. Graber¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2007

2016

Publication Types

Select...

Article3

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 3 Although this is a relatively new area of inquiry in comparative politics, scholars of American politics have been asking similar questions for some time. For an overview of this body of scholarship, see Graber (2005). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority

Roesler¹

2007

Law &Amp; Social Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority

Roesler¹

2007

Law &Amp; Social Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools

Keck

2007

Law &Amp; Social Inquiry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teaching internationalisation?: Surveying the lack of pedagogical and theoretical diversity in American International Relations

Cook

2016

Learning and Teaching

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article contributes to the discussion of internationalisation in higher education in the context of the international relations (IR) subfield of political science. The field of IR might seem by definition to be ‘internationalised’, but the underlying theoretical assumptions of the field, its social science rationalism and privileging of the unitary nation-state exhibit an American or Eurocentric bias. This Western bias with its emphasis on security issues is then replicated in research agendas and reproduced in higher education classrooms across the United States and beyond. I argue that the way forward to promoting internationalisation partially lies with promoting plurality and diversity within research and in the classroom or what Lamy calls ‘challenging hegemonic paradigms’ (2007).

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Constitutionalism and Political Science: Imaginative Scholarship, Unimaginative Teaching

Cited by 3 publications

References 36 publications

Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority

Permutations of Judicial Power: The New Constitutionalism and the Expansion of Judicial Authority

Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools

Teaching internationalisation?: Surveying the lack of pedagogical and theoretical diversity in American International Relations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About