2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive model calibration for the thermal viscoelastic-viscoplastic behavior of high density polyethylene under monotonic and cyclic loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the stress strain data at diverse temperatures of 23 • C, 60 • C and 80 • C and strain rates of 0.00333 s −1 , 0.0333 s −1 and 0.333 s −1 [39], JC parameters were developed to reflect the material behavior of HDPE during the FSW process. Table 2 presents the JC process parameters to model the material response of HDPE.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the stress strain data at diverse temperatures of 23 • C, 60 • C and 80 • C and strain rates of 0.00333 s −1 , 0.0333 s −1 and 0.333 s −1 [39], JC parameters were developed to reflect the material behavior of HDPE during the FSW process. Table 2 presents the JC process parameters to model the material response of HDPE.…”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that a proper constitutive model calibration improves the capability of numerical models in predicting the large deformation behavior of polymeric lattice materials, particularly the ones fabricated with base materials that are highly sensitive to strain and temperature variations. With this regard, Almomani et al [127] and Shahin et al [128] provided constitutive model calibrations of the time and temperature-dependent behavior of HDPE material.…”
Section: Uniaxial Compression Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quite a few viscoelastic-viscoplastic constitutive models are available to capture the strain-rate dependent stress-strain response of SCPs. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] These models differ by the position and layout of the spring and dashpot in the rheological framework. 27 Additionally, the evolution of viscous shear stresses over time differs across these models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models, however, have difficulty predicting both the hardening response at both high strains and the rate‐dependent mechanical characteristics. Quite a few viscoelastic–viscoplastic constitutive models are available to capture the strain‐rate dependent stress–strain response of SCPs 19–26 . These models differ by the position and layout of the spring and dashpot in the rheological framework 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%