2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive modeling of solid propellants for three dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Tunç et al. [19, 20] proposed three‐dimensional constitutive models and implemented the models in a finite element software (ABAQUS). The effects of pressure were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Tunç et al. [19, 20] proposed three‐dimensional constitutive models and implemented the models in a finite element software (ABAQUS). The effects of pressure were considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under storage and transportation conditions, the reliability of solid propellant rocket motors must be considered carefully, especially the degradation of the structural capability of the propellant must be investigated and controlled within a certain range [19]. Three-dimensional constitutive models were proposed to explain the mechanical phenomena of solid propellants, and then implemented in finite element analyses [20][21][22]. In these studies, the viscoelasticity and damage were considered but the fatigue life was not considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To represent the effect of pressure on the stress‐strain properties, Özüpek [29] proposed to incorporate the pressure on the volume dilatation by an exponential multiplier containing pressure term directly. Furthermore, Canga [30] and Tunç [31, 32] modified and implemented it into a commercial software ABAQUS as a user material. According to the finite strain constitutive model framework and Park's experimental results, Kumar et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%