2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-018-1188-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive Modeling of the Flow Stress of GCr15 Continuous Casting Bloom in the Heavy Reduction Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the temperature distribution at the strand solidification end predicted by this 2D heat transfer model, the slab initial temperature field in the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model could be determined with the interpolation method. The Arrhenius-type constitutive equations, derived based on the measured true stress-strain curves under conditions of different strain rates and temperatures in the present authors' previous work, [20,21] as shown in Figure 4, were applied to the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model as material properties to accurately describe the metal flow behavior of the casting slab during HR, which can be expressed as:…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the temperature distribution at the strand solidification end predicted by this 2D heat transfer model, the slab initial temperature field in the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model could be determined with the interpolation method. The Arrhenius-type constitutive equations, derived based on the measured true stress-strain curves under conditions of different strain rates and temperatures in the present authors' previous work, [20,21] as shown in Figure 4, were applied to the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model as material properties to accurately describe the metal flow behavior of the casting slab during HR, which can be expressed as:…”
Section: Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By conducting industrial experiments, Cheng et al [19] compared the difference between single-roll and multiroll reduction modes during HR for alleviating porosity in billets, and the porosity closure behavior was simulated with a 3D FEM to further clarify the difference between these two reduction modes. The present authors presented a two-stage sequential HR technology, [15] and the flow stress, [20,21] deformation, [22][23][24] macrosegregation, [25] and recrystallization [26] of continuous casting slab or bloom with HR was investigated systematically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accurately describe the deformation behavior of the GCr15 bloom between the reduction rolls and bloom surface, the properties of steel material have been taken from our previous work, 11,17 such as density, thermal conductivity, specific heat capacity and thermal expansion coefficient. In addition, an Arrhenius-type constitutive equation of high carbon steel 11,17,18 has been adopted in the 3D thermalmechanical coupled model. With this model, the effect of differential reduction amount of the first and the end reduction rolls on evolution of stress and displacement in as-cast bloom was systematically investigated under different process parameters.…”
Section: Development Of Mechanical Soft Reduction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to accurately describe the metal flow behavior of the wide-thick slab during HR, the true stress-strain of the studied steel grade was measured at different temperatures and strain rates, and the measured results are presented in Figure 5. Based on the measured results in Figure 5, an Arrhenius-type constitutive model was derived with the similar method adopted in our previous work for establishing an Arrhenius-type constitutive model of GCr15 steel [35]. The derived constitutive model of the studied steel was then applied to the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model, and the strain and stress in the constitutive model were adopted as equivalent strain and equivalent stress in the 3D thermal-mechanical coupled model.…”
Section: D Thermal-mechanical Coupled Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to show the accuracy of the derived Arrhenius-type constitutive model, flow stress under different temperature and strain rates was calculated with this constitutive model, and the calculated results are compared with the measured ones in Figure 6. Based on the measured and the calculated results in Figure 6, the standard statistical parameters of average absolute relative error (AARE) for the measured and the calculated values, which has been adopted in our previous work [35], was calculated with Equation (5). It is found that the value of AARE is about 4.7%, which proves the accuracy of the derived constitutive model.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%