2011
DOI: 10.3103/s0025654411060045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constitutive relations for calculating the processes of quasistatic deformation, damage, and fracture of bodies (Including those with concentrators) made of filled polymer materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, where the stress values in the process of relaxation of material A at various strain levels are given in logarithmic coordinates. The test duration in these experiments was nearly 8 × 10 5 s. The series of points 1, 3, 5 correspond to the experimental dependence of the conditional stress s 11 …”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, where the stress values in the process of relaxation of material A at various strain levels are given in logarithmic coordinates. The test duration in these experiments was nearly 8 × 10 5 s. The series of points 1, 3, 5 correspond to the experimental dependence of the conditional stress s 11 …”
Section: Experimental Techniquementioning
confidence: 84%
“…The endochronic theory was generalized to the case of finite strains in [10]. The version of the theory proposed in [11] permits taking into account the influence of the hydrostatic pressure and temperature on the properties of the material and describing the damage accumulation process in the material under strain. The results of experimental verification of these generalizations showed that the developed endochronic approach permits obtaining a sufficiently complete description of various specific characteristics of mechanical behavior of highly filled polymer systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "switching-off" of the other nonlinearity functions in model (2.1)-(2.6) can be explained by the fact that, under the conditions of shock compression, it is assumed that the value of the limit strain intensity is much greater than the value ε u realized in the problems under study, and thus ω < ω l . To modify the theory at the expense of the law (4.2) for variable coefficients c P , c c of the function ϕ P (χ), it is necessary to modify the subprogram UMAT developed earlier in [16], which determines the properties of nonstandard materials in the program complex ABAQUS. The modeling of the process of the hammer fall on the specimen starts from identification of the func-tionR(t) of dynamic shear relaxation.…”
Section: Axial Shock Compressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical model [15] has a wide experimental justification (the comparison in [15] with the results of [8][9][10] of more than 50 programs of quasistatic loading with various laws of strain variation at different levels of hydrostatic pressure and temperature; the materials were highly filled rubbers of three grades) and a detailed and relatively simple procedure for identifying the material constants. In [16], the tensor generalization of the model [15] was carried out (in incremental form) and a method for solving the initial boundaryvalue problems was proposed, implemented in software, and tested by finite-element computations of geometrically nonlinear deformation and local fracture of bodies with strongly inhomogeneous stress state. The dynamical version of the model [15] was used in [17] to solve the problem of shock compression for a cylinder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation