2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-0427.2004.00380.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Efficient Fine‐cum‐Tax Rate Structures: The Case of Constant Relative Risk Aversion

Abstract: This paper explores the possibility that fines and tax rates impose different welfare costs on different types of taxpayer, so that the government may want to apply different fine/tax rate treatments to different types of taxpayer. Under the assumption that taxpayers exhibit constant relative risk aversion, we characterize the constrained Pareto-efficient fine/tax rate structure, showing that: (i) the co-existence of compliers (the above-ground economy) and evaders (the underground economy) is typical at the P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, if evasion 3 The Allingham and Sandmo framework has been extended in several directions over the past 30 years and it is still present in the current literature (see e.g. Bernasconi, 1998;Borck, 2004;Glen et al, 2004;Richter & Boadway, 2005;Fortin et al 2007).…”
Section: (A) If the Absolute Risk Aversion Index Is Decreasingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if evasion 3 The Allingham and Sandmo framework has been extended in several directions over the past 30 years and it is still present in the current literature (see e.g. Bernasconi, 1998;Borck, 2004;Glen et al, 2004;Richter & Boadway, 2005;Fortin et al 2007).…”
Section: (A) If the Absolute Risk Aversion Index Is Decreasingmentioning
confidence: 99%