2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10463-009-0255-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained estimation using judgment post-stratification

Abstract: Convexity, Maximum likelihood, Ranked-set sampling, Stratified sampling,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the constraints on p 2 when the overall CDF value is r = 0.5 and m = 3. Frey and Ozturk (2010) showed that for any fixed value of r , B(r ; 1, 3) ≤ p 2 ≤ B(r ; 3, 1), where B(·; α, β) is the CDF for a Beta(α, β) distribution. With r = 0.5, this leads to constraints 1/8 ≤ p 2 ≤ 7/8.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Consider the constraints on p 2 when the overall CDF value is r = 0.5 and m = 3. Frey and Ozturk (2010) showed that for any fixed value of r , B(r ; 1, 3) ≤ p 2 ≤ B(r ; 3, 1), where B(·; α, β) is the CDF for a Beta(α, β) distribution. With r = 0.5, this leads to constraints 1/8 ≤ p 2 ≤ 7/8.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the spaces K c r and K s r for r = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 and m = 3. It also, for comparison purposes, shows the space K r of possible values for ( p 1 , p 2 ) under thep = r assumption and the constraints obtained by Frey and Ozturk (2010). Recall that p i ≡ F [i] (y) so that r =p = F(y) is the overall CDF value.…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations