The 2002 International Conference on Control and Automation, 2002. ICCA. Final Program and Book of Abstracts.
DOI: 10.1109/icca.2002.1229516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained H-infinity control of active suspensions: an lmi approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
202
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
202
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, robust control synthesis for active suspension systems has been investigated by several researchers (Lauwerys et al, 2005;Ray, 1992). Recently, several authors employed H ∞ -based control to improve the robustness properties and disturbance attenuation of active suspensions (Chen and Kong-Hui, 2005;Hayakawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, robust control synthesis for active suspension systems has been investigated by several researchers (Lauwerys et al, 2005;Ray, 1992). Recently, several authors employed H ∞ -based control to improve the robustness properties and disturbance attenuation of active suspensions (Chen and Kong-Hui, 2005;Hayakawa et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to optimal control strategies seeking to achieve a balance between different optimization objectives. Despite the huge improvement effected through optimal control, the problem of explicitly adapting the weighting coefficients corresponding to different degrees of perturbations remained unsolved, especially in active suspension researches [16][17][18][19]. As a result, the energy efficiency of the active suspension controller is reduced and the algorithm turns out to be more conservative.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But performances are fixed (Chen and Guo, 2005). Then, LPV control is used either to enforce robustness by scheduling the controller according to measured varying parameters (Zin et al, 2006) or to change the desiderated performances by scheduling the controller objectives using exogenous parameters (Fialho and Balas, 2002;PoussotVassal et al, 2007).…”
Section: Lpv/h ∞ Control a Polytopic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%