1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02293648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained multidimensional scaling inN spaces

Abstract: individual differences in multidimensional scaling, least squares estimation,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of this is in the fact that MAXSCAL-2.1 can provide suitable statistical criteria for identification of the best fitting model. Although the range of constraints that can be handled by MAXSCAL-2.1 is still limited, it should not be very difficult to extend its scope to the kinds of constraints discussed by Bentler and Weeks [1978] and Bloxom [1978]. (See also Ramsay, 1980a.…”
Section: Concludin# Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of this is in the fact that MAXSCAL-2.1 can provide suitable statistical criteria for identification of the best fitting model. Although the range of constraints that can be handled by MAXSCAL-2.1 is still limited, it should not be very difficult to extend its scope to the kinds of constraints discussed by Bentler and Weeks [1978] and Bloxom [1978]. (See also Ramsay, 1980a.…”
Section: Concludin# Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theory any Dimenionlity Reduction (DR) method can be extended to fit the purpose by adding constraints. For example, a "dummy point" that has the same distance to all the other points can be added to a MDS approach to achieve a circular or spherical embedding [10,8,27]. Also, methods were developed to generate spherical embeddings using a SOM [45].…”
Section: Spherical-based Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to other spherical embedding approaches that requires the generation of an artificial "dummy point" [10], [8] and [27] or tuning of parameters [45], Cox and Cox's method achieves non-metric MDS on a sphere in a simpler manner. SSE extends the capability of Cox and Cox's method by integrating it with a series of interactions and detail-on-demand visualizations, and embedding the spherical view in a multiple-coordinated-view where the analyst can examine the data from different perspectives.…”
Section: Spherical-based Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These latent variables are constructed without reference to environmental measurements, but they can subsequently be compared with actual environmental data if available. To these three well-known types of gradient analysis we add a fourth, constrained ordination, which has its roots in the psychometric literature on multidimensional scaling (Bloxom, 1978;De Leeuw and Heiser, 1980;. Constrained ordination also constructs axes of variation in overall community composition, but does so in such a way as to explicitly optimize the fit to supplied environmental data (Ter Braak, 1986a, 1987c.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%