2020
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained spherical deconvolution of nonspherically sampled diffusion MRI data

Abstract: Constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD) of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a popular analysis method that extracts the full white matter (WM) fiber orientation density function (fODF) in the living human brain, noninvasively. It assumes that the DW-MRI signal on the sphere can be represented as the spherical convolution of a single-fiber response function (RF) and the fODF, and recovers the fODF through the inverse operation. CSD approaches typically require that the DW-MRI data is sampled shell-wise, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, by analyzing changes in parameters such as Fractional Anisotropy, it might be possible to additionally infer on the state of the examined nerves [28][29][30]. To obtain sufficient precision of the research, it will be important to use suitable methods to eliminate spatial systematic errors [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by analyzing changes in parameters such as Fractional Anisotropy, it might be possible to additionally infer on the state of the examined nerves [28][29][30]. To obtain sufficient precision of the research, it will be important to use suitable methods to eliminate spatial systematic errors [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When fitting data acquired with strong diffusion weighting, it might be beneficial to take into account the presence of a minimum signal offset due to Rician noise in the measurements (Gudbjartsson and Patz 1995; Basu, Fletcher, and Whitaker 2006). One of the submissions considered in this work extended the DKI method with an offset term to account for such effect (DKI+Offset)(Morez et al 2020). This method was fit to SDE data by extending the classic DKI model with an additional degrees of freedom (22 + 1 = 23 free parameters), and to DDE and DODE data by extending a fourth order covariance tensor (28 + 1 = 29 free parameters) (C.-F. Westin et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we acknowledge that the LMM approach could also be applied to multi‐shell data acquired with a single diffusion time, recognizing that the sensitivity to length scales across restricted and hindered compartments may be more limited. For the analysis of data acquired with nonspherical sampling, either Cartesian sampling or due to gradient nonlinearities, the single‐fiber response functions could be adopted to also describe their radial dependency, similar to (Morez et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%