2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00161-007-0041-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained stability for biaxial nematic phases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is shown in Ref. [56,20,18], with greater rigor than observed here, that only within this region, the state of complete alignment of two molecules is a non-degenerate minimum for the given mutual orientational interaction energy.…”
Section: Ground State Ternary Diagramsupporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is shown in Ref. [56,20,18], with greater rigor than observed here, that only within this region, the state of complete alignment of two molecules is a non-degenerate minimum for the given mutual orientational interaction energy.…”
Section: Ground State Ternary Diagramsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…The phase diagram as a function of the biaxiality is found by studying the minima of the internal energy (2.9) as a function of the changing biaxiality parameters λ 1 , λ 2 and λ 3 . As described in detail elsewhere [43,18,14], each physical significant phase can be described by thirty-six equivalent choices of the order parameters S, P , D and C. In a system with D 2h symmetry, this multiplicity of the order parameters is due to the physical irrelevance of the specific labels associated with the molecular and laboratory axes. In the same way, there are also six possible values of the set (λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 ), related by a different choice of the axis labels, where the physical behavior of the liquid crystals is equivalent.…”
Section: Ground State Ternary Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phase diagram possesses some reflection symmetry around λ m (discussed in more detail, e.g in [31,32]), so that the phase N + U and N − U can be regarded as alternative representations of the same phase. Equivalently, for each λ > λ m it is possible to redefine axes in such a way as to associate this value of λ with a lower degree of biaxiality λ ′ .…”
Section: Molecular Field Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MF also predicts a direct N B − I transition inside the parameter region IC 2 C 3 , and tricritical nature for N U − N B transition along C 1 C 3 [32]. The MF analysis based on mini-max principle involving only the two dominant order parameters (out of the four) permits the existence of a biaxial phase even at the base point V of triangle (λ = 0), though such a phase is forbidden on grounds of biaxial stability [33]. …”
Section: Hamiltonian Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to recent mean field (MF) treatments [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the relevant Hamiltonian parameter space conducive to the formation of stable biaxial phase comprises of a triangular region (say, ∆) in the (γ, λ) plane (the essential triangle) shown in Fig. 1 [32], the long axes of the molecules defining the primary director.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%