2014
DOI: 10.5614/j.math.fund.sci.2014.46.1.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constrained Two-Dimensional Inversion of Gravity Data

Abstract: Abstract. The non-uniqueness in the solution of gravity inversion poses a major problem in the interpretation of gravity data. To overcome this ambiguity, "a priori" information is introduced by minimizing a functional that describes the geometrical or physical properties of the solution. This paper presents a 2D gravity inversion technique incorporating axes of anomalous mass concentration as constraints. The inverse problem is formulated as a minimization of the moment of inertia of the causative body with r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second test model was a vertical model whose contrast density values were the same as those of the first. These models were the same as the models used by Grandis and Dahrin [15] in their work on constraining a 2D gravity inversion by using the explicit positions of the axes of an anomalous body. The geometry of the test models is depicted by the dashed rectangular in Figures 2 and 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second test model was a vertical model whose contrast density values were the same as those of the first. These models were the same as the models used by Grandis and Dahrin [15] in their work on constraining a 2D gravity inversion by using the explicit positions of the axes of an anomalous body. The geometry of the test models is depicted by the dashed rectangular in Figures 2 and 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of minimum distance, smoothness, and compactness constraints were performed by Vatankhah, et al [14]. Also, Grandis and Dahrin [15] proposed minimization of the moment inertia of the causal anomalous object with respect to the axes of mass concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the modeling of gravity data involving their gradients for quantitative interpretation will result in more sharp lateral boundaries. It is also expected that the use of gradients in a gravity inversion will reduce the non-uniqueness inherent in the modeling of the potential fields data [17,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of has been chosen as a constant value by many authors. Last and Kubic [24] and Vatankhah et al [36] presented ; Guillen and Menichetti [25], Barbosa et al [26], Barbosa and Silva [27], Silva et al [28,29] and Grandis and Dahrin [37] have chosen . In this study the value of is variable and depends on the situations coming from the depth of causative bodies and prior information.…”
Section: Wherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large value of wj will force the prism density contrast to be 'frozen' at the violated boundary, at least temporarily during the first few iterations. This way, the response of the modified parameter estimates will not fit the observations, which will in turn trigger the necessity for further parameter perturbation as a function of the misfit [25,26,37]. For positivity constraints, the lower bound should be equal or close to zero.…”
Section: Bound and Positivity Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%