2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2201.05846
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining a late time transition of $G_{\rm eff}$ using low-z galaxy survey data

G. Alestas,
L. Perivolaropoulos,
K. Tanidis
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hints for such a transition in the values of dynamical parameters connected to the gravitational constant have recently been pointed out in Cepheid SnIa calibrator data [33,34], in Tully-Fisher data [35] and in solar system history data [36] which indicate an increase of the rate of impactors on the Moon and Earth surfaces by about a factor of 2-3 during the past 100Myrs which correspond to z < 0.008 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Such a transition is also consistent with low redshift galaxy surveys data [44].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Hints for such a transition in the values of dynamical parameters connected to the gravitational constant have recently been pointed out in Cepheid SnIa calibrator data [33,34], in Tully-Fisher data [35] and in solar system history data [36] which indicate an increase of the rate of impactors on the Moon and Earth surfaces by about a factor of 2-3 during the past 100Myrs which correspond to z < 0.008 [37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Such a transition is also consistent with low redshift galaxy surveys data [44].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This tension suggests possible deviation from the standard ΛCDM cosmological model, inspiring people to explore the physical reasons behind this phenomenon. In particular, since the new data show greater tension, this issue has again aroused a lot of attention and research [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To that end, introducing a non-minimal coupling places one in the Brans-Dicke/ f (R) gravity class [54,55] (see Table 1). However, evidence for evolution in the Newton's constant, and therefore G 4 (φ), is weak, and on the contrary, one has strong solar system [63] and BBN constraints [64] (see also [65][66][67] and [68][69][70] and references therein for an alternative view). On the minimal assumption that the coupling G 4 (φ) evolves linearly with cosmic time, while employing model agnostic techniques for the Quintessence sector, G 2 (φ, X) = X − V(φ), we show in section 3 that any increase in H 0 is expected to be negligible.…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…physically explain an abrupt jump in G, e. g. [68][69][70]105]. 10 See [108] for a potential explanation in f (R) gravity.…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%