2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2022.136983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining baryon annihilation in the hadronic phase of heavy-ion collisions via event-by-event fluctuations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(68 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neglecting the dynamics of the hadronic phase, this suppression is consistent with longrange, essentially global, conservation of the baryon number, while the additional effect of excluded volume cannot be distinguished within the presently available experimental uncertainties [19]. However, the agreement with the data breaks down when baryon annihilation in the hadronic phase modeled by UrQMD is incorporated simultaneously with global baryon conservation [20]. In this case, the agreement is recovered if a more local (in the rapidity space) conservation of the baryon number is imposed instead.…”
Section: Proton Number Cumulants From Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Neglecting the dynamics of the hadronic phase, this suppression is consistent with longrange, essentially global, conservation of the baryon number, while the additional effect of excluded volume cannot be distinguished within the presently available experimental uncertainties [19]. However, the agreement with the data breaks down when baryon annihilation in the hadronic phase modeled by UrQMD is incorporated simultaneously with global baryon conservation [20]. In this case, the agreement is recovered if a more local (in the rapidity space) conservation of the baryon number is imposed instead.…”
Section: Proton Number Cumulants From Hydrodynamicssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…This means that even when only a reduced set of particles is taken into account, where the effect of the baryon number conservation is not as strong anymore, the process N N → 5π has a strong influence on the kurtosis. Compared to [36] we only see an effect of the annihilation process on the fourth cumulant.…”
Section: Baryon Annihilationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…As a start, the impact of a baryon annihilation process in a simplified hadronic system is investigated. At higher beam ener-gies annihilation processes are important in the late stage hadronic rescattering phase [35,36]. Since the geometric collision criterion is employed the representative baryon annihilation process B B ↔ 5π has to be modeled with binary interactions.…”
Section: Net Baryon Number Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the authors of Ref. [27] pointed out that precision measurements of κ 2 [p − p]/⟨p + p⟩ at the LHC are also sensitive both to the range of baryon conservation as well as to baryon annihilation in the hadronic phase. Namely, a surplus of annihilation over regeneration leads to an increase of κ 2 [p − p]/⟨p + p⟩ while reducing the range of correlations associated with baryon conservation brings this quantity down.…”
Section: Hydrodynamics Based Analysis Of (Net-)proton Fluctuationsmentioning
confidence: 99%