2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining geologic properties and processes through the use of impact craters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 233 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is thus not intended as a comprehensive historical review of cratering and its uses for chronology. The reader in search of more detail may wish to seek out other recent reviews on these topics [e.g., Tanaka and Hartmann , ; Barlow , ; Werner and Ivanov , ] or older, still pertinent reviews [ McGill , ; Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group , ; Basaltic Volcanism Study Project , ; Stöffler et al ., ]. The goal here is instead to provide a current perspective on using crater populations to infer information about the geochronology of the terrestrial planets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus not intended as a comprehensive historical review of cratering and its uses for chronology. The reader in search of more detail may wish to seek out other recent reviews on these topics [e.g., Tanaka and Hartmann , ; Barlow , ; Werner and Ivanov , ] or older, still pertinent reviews [ McGill , ; Crater Analysis Techniques Working Group , ; Basaltic Volcanism Study Project , ; Stöffler et al ., ]. The goal here is instead to provide a current perspective on using crater populations to infer information about the geochronology of the terrestrial planets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transient crater diameter and depth are predominately controlled by the kinetic energy of the projectile [ Kenkmann et al ., ; Melosh , ; Wünnemann et al ., ]. The correlations between ejecta runout distance, perimeter, and area with PC1 are consistent with the maximum extent of the ejecta being strongly related to its kinetic energy [ Barlow , ]. PC1 is therefore interpreted as representing the inverse of impactor energy (due to the correlations between PC1 and the original variables having a negative sign).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Principal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first principal component (PC1) expresses the relationship between the morphological and morphometric characteristics of the ejecta layers (dimensions and lobateness) and the size of the crater cavities (diameters and depths). These variables depend on the energy of the impact and the rheological characteristics of the target material [ Barlow , ]. The transient crater diameter and depth are predominately controlled by the kinetic energy of the projectile [ Kenkmann et al ., ; Melosh , ; Wünnemann et al ., ].…”
Section: Interpretation Of Principal Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craters have been used as important landmarks for high-precise landing of lander, autonomous spacecraft and rover navigation and control (Yu et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2015). Furthermore, craters also play an important role in the study of planets chronology (Barlow, 2015). The size frequency distribution of primary craters can provide the primary mechanism for establishing chronology of planetary surfaces (Head et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%