2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2019.119355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining in situ cosmogenic nuclide paleo-production rates using sequential lava flows during a paleomagnetic field strength low

Abstract: Please cite this article as: Balbas AM, Farley KA, Constraining in situ cosmogenic nuclide paleo-production rates using sequential lava flows during a paleomagnetic field strength low,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This local production rate was scaled to sea level and high lati- (Hofmann, 2019) extracted from the same samples as the magnetite studied here. The best-fit model uses the same parameters as in (a), but was optimized for the exposure age and inherited concentration, with a scaled surface 10 Be production rate from the CRONUS-Earth online calculator (Balco et al, 2008). This measurement establishes the surface exposure age used to calibrate the production rate in magnetite.…”
Section: Calibration Of the 3 He Production Rate In Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This local production rate was scaled to sea level and high lati- (Hofmann, 2019) extracted from the same samples as the magnetite studied here. The best-fit model uses the same parameters as in (a), but was optimized for the exposure age and inherited concentration, with a scaled surface 10 Be production rate from the CRONUS-Earth online calculator (Balco et al, 2008). This measurement establishes the surface exposure age used to calibrate the production rate in magnetite.…”
Section: Calibration Of the 3 He Production Rate In Magnetitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production rates of cosmogenic nuclides are usually determined from calibration sites where independent controls on exposure history are available such as 14 C dating from organic materials (e.g., Lifton et al, 2015) or argon ( 40 Ar/ 39 Ar) dating from lava flows (e.g., Balbas and Farley, 2020;Fenton et al, 2019). However, the commonly used estimates of muogenic 14 C production rates (for both negative muon capture and fast muon reactions) were derived through laboratory irradiation of artificial target compounds 105 (Heisinger et al, 2002a(Heisinger et al, , 2002b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%