“…In the profit from the development of kinematic models for fault-related folds (Suppe, 1983;Suppe and Medwedeff, 1990;Erslev, 1991;Hardy and Poblet, 1994;Wickham, 1995;Allmendinger, 1998;Mitra, 2003;Cardozo, 2008;Hardy and Allmendinger, 2011;Poblet and Lisle, 2011;Brandes and Tanner, 2014), scholars try to estimate the active fold geometry using deformation patterns of geomorphic markers (Thompson et al, 2002;Gold et al, 2006;Scharer et al, 2006;Wilson et al, 2009;Burgess et al, 2012). Based on kinematic models for fault-related folds geometry and geomorphic deformation, the geometry of the related fault can also be estimated (Hu et al, 2015(Hu et al, , 2017(Hu et al, , 2019bLiu et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2020;Zhong et al, 2020), which provides a more convenient way to investigate the subsurface fault geometry. Due to the uncertainty derived from the selection of the fold model and from the assumption of the fault dip close to the surface (e.g., Hu et al, 2015), the reliability of the estimated fault geometry is still questionable.…”