2019
DOI: 10.21468/scipostphys.7.4.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining new physics from Higgs measurements with Lilith: update to LHC Run 2 results

Abstract: Lilith is a public Python library for constraining new physics from Higgs signal strength measurements. We here present version 2.0 of Lilith together with an updated XML database which includes the current ATLAS and CMS Run 2 Higgs results for 36 fb −1 . Both the code and the database were extended from the ordinary Gaussian approximation employed in Lilith-1.1 to using variable Gaussian and Poisson likelihoods. Moreover, Lilith can now make use of correlation matrices of arbitrary dimension. We provide detai… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where σ SM is the SM prediction, σ k are contributions arising from the interference of a single dimension-6 operator with the SM, and σ kl arise from the interference of two rate measurements or the total cross section, because they offer the best statistics and often minimize theoretical uncertainties. From global Higgs-electroweak analyses we know that a modified momentum dependence can be constrained most efficiently by high-energy tails of kinematic distributions or simplified template cross sections [8][9][10][11][12][13]. † Similarly, we know that for many kinematic distributions the few bins with the highest momentum transfer include the relevant information on individual operators, whereas for several operators with a different high-energy behavior there often exist several relevant regimes [104].…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where σ SM is the SM prediction, σ k are contributions arising from the interference of a single dimension-6 operator with the SM, and σ kl arise from the interference of two rate measurements or the total cross section, because they offer the best statistics and often minimize theoretical uncertainties. From global Higgs-electroweak analyses we know that a modified momentum dependence can be constrained most efficiently by high-energy tails of kinematic distributions or simplified template cross sections [8][9][10][11][12][13]. † Similarly, we know that for many kinematic distributions the few bins with the highest momentum transfer include the relevant information on individual operators, whereas for several operators with a different high-energy behavior there often exist several relevant regimes [104].…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the SMEFT framework [1][2][3][4][5] was developed as a gauge-invariant description of anomalous gauge boson interactions at LEP [6,7]. Its biggest success has been the application to Higgs and electroweak boson measurements at the LHC [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Most recently, the same approach [14][15][16] has been used to systematically analyze top quark measurements at the LHC [17][18][19][20][21] and at future colliders [22,23] and their link to bottom sector [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For details on the implementation of Lilith-2 and experimental data used, see Refs. [81,82]. In Fig.…”
Section: Global Fit To the Twin Higgs Parametersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is performed with Lilith-2 [81,82] which incorporates all of the relevant LHC Run-2 data. For the global χ 2 analysis Lilith-2 employs variable Gaussian and Poisson likelihoods with full LHC Run-2 data from ATLAS and CMS for 36 fb −1 .…”
Section: Global Fit To the Twin Higgs Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2.3) alone. In this region, more stringent but also more model-dependent bounds from the measurement of the Higgs-boson coupling strength may be applied to the Higgs-portal model [38,39].…”
Section: Reinterpretation Of Upper Limitsmentioning
confidence: 99%