2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining stress magnitudes using petroleum exploration data in the Cooper–Eromanga Basins, Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, observations of in situ stress orientations and magnitudes demonstrate that these expressions do not fully explain crustal stresses (McGarr and Gay, 1978;Zoback et al, 1980;Brudy et al, 1997;Reynolds et al, 2006). The actual state of stress in the lithosphere differs from these two reference states, for example, as a result of tectonic stresses arising from interactions at the boundaries of lithospheric plates (Turcotte and Schubert, 1982;Engelder, 1993;Caputo, 2005).…”
Section: Elastic Rheology and Stress Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, observations of in situ stress orientations and magnitudes demonstrate that these expressions do not fully explain crustal stresses (McGarr and Gay, 1978;Zoback et al, 1980;Brudy et al, 1997;Reynolds et al, 2006). The actual state of stress in the lithosphere differs from these two reference states, for example, as a result of tectonic stresses arising from interactions at the boundaries of lithospheric plates (Turcotte and Schubert, 1982;Engelder, 1993;Caputo, 2005).…”
Section: Elastic Rheology and Stress Magnitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carminati et al, 2004 ). On the other hand, in situ measurements in deep boreholes indicate higher horizontal than vertical stresses ( McGarr and Gay, 1978;Brudy et al, 1997;Reynolds et al, 2006 ), and both reference states represent, at best, incomplete approaches to lithospheric stresses. Several natural processes can modify the reference state, such as tectonic stresses arising from plate boundaries, topographic loading, unloading due to erosion, lithospheric bending, thermoelastic loads, and pore fluid pressure ( Turcotte and Schubert, 1982;Twiss and Moores, 1992;Engelder, 1993;Caputo, 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This test, referred to as minifrac in the petroleum industry, is pumping test usually conducted in the design and execution of large scale fracture stimulation jobs [Reynolds at al., 2006]. A minifrac test creates a fracture perpendicular to the minimum principal stress (the minimum horizontal stress in either a strike-slip or normal stress regime) by increasing the pressure in an isolated section of the wellbore.…”
Section: Acquirement Of Minifrac Test Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact is due to the leak-off pressures do not yield as reliable an estimate of the minimum horizontal stress magnitude as those determined from minifrac tests. This is largely because the disturbed stress field at the wellbore wall controls the leak-off pressure, and because the leak-off pressure must overcome any tensile strength of the formation [Reynolds et al, 2006]). For this study, closure pressures from minifrac tests were provided as shown in Figure 6b.…”
Section: Es4004mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cooper and Eromanga sedimentary basins (~3.6 km thick) act as an insulating cap over the granitic EGS reservoir (Holl and Barton 2015). The project area is characterized by a compressive stress field oriented approximately in E-W direction (Reynolds, et al 2006, Reynolds, et al 2005. In November 2012, the Habanero-4 well was stimulated by injecting 36.5 ML of near-surface aquifer-sourced water (13 Ωm at 25°C) over 14 days (Hogarth, et al 2013, Holl and Barton 2015, McMahon and Baisch 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%