2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.105.104004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the Konoplya-Rezzolla-Zhidenko deformation parameters III: Limits from stellar-mass black holes using gravitational-wave observations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The essence of this approach is a general parametrization of the black-hole spacetime, similar in spirit with the post-Newtonian parametrized formalism, but working in the whole space outside the black hole including the nearhorizon zone. This formalism was extensively applied for analytic approximations of various numerical black-hole metrics (see, for instance, [22][23][24] and references therein) as well as for analysis of various radiation phenomena around them [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The advantage of this method is that frequently it allows one to approximate the black hole spacetime by only a few parameters for description of astrophysically relevant phenomena [35].…”
Section: General Parametrized Spherically Symmetric Black Hole In Ads...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The essence of this approach is a general parametrization of the black-hole spacetime, similar in spirit with the post-Newtonian parametrized formalism, but working in the whole space outside the black hole including the nearhorizon zone. This formalism was extensively applied for analytic approximations of various numerical black-hole metrics (see, for instance, [22][23][24] and references therein) as well as for analysis of various radiation phenomena around them [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. The advantage of this method is that frequently it allows one to approximate the black hole spacetime by only a few parameters for description of astrophysically relevant phenomena [35].…”
Section: General Parametrized Spherically Symmetric Black Hole In Ads...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could certainly constrain q from the available gravitational wave data from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration following the approach employed in Refs. [19,20] for testing other non-Kerr metrics. The deformation parameter q may also be constrained from the available mm black hole images from the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (see, e.g., Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both object classes, we have even a body of observations suggesting that these objects do not have a normal surface but an event horizon [14,15]. The past few years have seen a tremendous progress in our capability of testing the nature of these compact objects and today we can use gravitational wave data from the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Collaboration [16][17][18][19][20], X-ray observations from a number of X-ray missions [21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and the mm images of the supermassive objects in M87 * and Sgr A * from the Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They provided models to account for astrophysical uncertainties linked to parameters in the accretion disk, and placed constraints on parameters characterizing circular deviations from Kerr, accounting for astrophysical uncertainties linked to parameters of the accretion disk. Another approach has been taken in [86,87], where constraints on deviation parameters were derived using gravitational wave data from the LIGO/VIRGO collaboration on the inspiral phase of black-hole mergers. Going forward, both approaches may be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%