2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the masses of microlensing black holes and the mass gap with Gaia DR2

Abstract: Context. Gravitational microlensing is sensitive to compact-object lenses in the Milky Way, including white dwarfs, neutron stars, or black holes, and could potentially probe a wide range of stellar-remnant masses. However, the mass of the lens can be determined only in very limited cases, due to missing information on both source and lens distances and their proper motions. Aims. Our aim is to improve the mass estimates in the annual parallax microlensing events found in the eight years of OGLE-III observatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, for events without caustic-crossings, the separation between the Earth and Roman's orbit at L2 will not be large enough to reveal a microlensing parallax measurement. Fortunately, for events with caustic-crossings the Earth-L2 separation yields a useful microlensing parallax measurement as Wyrzykowski et al (2020) demonstrate. Moreover, for events with anomalies due to terrestrial planets, the microlens parallax may be measurable even in the absence of caustic-crossing features (Gould, Gaudi & Han 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, for events without caustic-crossings, the separation between the Earth and Roman's orbit at L2 will not be large enough to reveal a microlensing parallax measurement. Fortunately, for events with caustic-crossings the Earth-L2 separation yields a useful microlensing parallax measurement as Wyrzykowski et al (2020) demonstrate. Moreover, for events with anomalies due to terrestrial planets, the microlens parallax may be measurable even in the absence of caustic-crossing features (Gould, Gaudi & Han 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At such mass-loss rates single stars (or stars in wide non-interacting binaries) may form ∼40 M He cores with ∼20−30 M H-rich envelopes leading to massive BH formation even at high metallicity. Such massive BHs would be found either as single BHs through microlensing surveys (e.g., Wyrzykowski & Mandel 2020) or in wide binaries through radial velocity surveys (motion of the companion star). We note that such massive BHs would not necessarily add to either LIGO/Virgo or X-ray binary populations that form (at least in classical isolated binary evolution) from interacting binaries in which stars lose their H-rich envelopes (e.g., this study, Wiktorowicz et al 2014).…”
Section: Isolated Binary Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important feature of this scenario is that it predicts the form of the PBH mass distribution precisely. We show that the expected form not only satisfies all the current astrophysical and cosmological constraints but also allows the PBHs to explain numerous observational conundra: (1) microlensing events towards the Galactic bulge generated by planet-mass objects with 1% of the CDM, well above most expectations for free-floating planets; (2) microlensing of quasars, including ones that are so misaligned with the lensing galaxy that the probability of lensing by a star is very low; (3) the unexpected high number of microlensing events towards the Galactic bulge by dark objects in the mass gap between 2 and 5 M [25], where stellar evolution models fail to form black holes [26]; (4) unexplained correlations in the source-subtracted X-ray and cosmic infrared background fluctuations [27]; (5) the non-observation of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies (UFDGs) below the critical radius of dynamical heating by PBHs [28]; (6) the mass, spins and coalescence rates for the black holes found by LIGO/Virgo [2]; (7)…”
Section: Extending the Scenario To The Thermal History Of The Universementioning
confidence: 95%