2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.84.054004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraining the neutron-neutron scattering length using the effective field theory without explicit pions

Abstract: We compute a model-independent correlation between the difference of neutron-neutron and proton-proton scattering lengths |a nn − a C pp | and the splitting in binding energies between Helium-3 and tritium nuclei. We use the effective field theory without explicit pions to show that this correlation relies only on the existence of large scattering lengths in the NN system. Our leadingorder calculation, taken together with experimental values for binding energies and a C pp , yields a nn = −22.9 ± 4.1 fm. * Ele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refs. [47,48]). Since the theoretical error for B T and B α is large relative to the experimental one, the Phillips and Tjon lines at LO in π /EFT do not constrain observables further at physical m π .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Refs. [47,48]). Since the theoretical error for B T and B α is large relative to the experimental one, the Phillips and Tjon lines at LO in π /EFT do not constrain observables further at physical m π .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is analogous to the use of π /EFT correlations [47,48] to infer values of poorly measured observables in the real world. If and when scattering observables are determined directly on the lattice, our predictions will be a further test of the consistency between π EFT and LQCD, establishing the validity of a theory with only contact interactions over a range of m π from 140 MeV up to 805 MeV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25], this difference is accounted for here by an N 2 LO correction, and for definiteness the central value favored by the pionless analysis of Ref. [43], a t,nn −(22.9 ± 4.1) fm, is adopted here. The small isospin breaking in the effective ranges, r C − r t 0.06 fm is also included at N 2 LO.…”
Section: Power Counting Around the Unitarity Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become clear that if perturbative renormalization is to be maintained, including electromagnetic effects is not as simple as adding a Coulomb potential to the short-range terms, as it is typically done in calculations based on effective pionless potentials [41][42][43][44]. Based on studying the regulator (cutoff) dependence of the amplitude, it was realized that in the presence of nonperturbative Coulomb effects an isospin breaking three-nucleon force is required to ensure renormalization at next-to-leading order (NLO) [24,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain 2-body scattering wave functions, we alternated between three methods to minimize the possibility of a mistake in the numerical implementation of either method: a Numerov integration, a version [39] of the variable phase method, and a variational method with a Gaussian trial wave function. Three-body wave functions and matrix elements were calculated with the refined-resonating-group method (RGM, original formulation: [40,41]; refinement and triton/ 3 He implementation: [42,43]) [44]. The variational RGM, as applied here, is significantly less accurate than the Numerov integration and the variable-phase method.…”
Section: Toolboxmentioning
confidence: 99%