2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/6842549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Combined with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Premotor Cortex Improves Motor Function in Severe Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Objective. We compared the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation at different cortical sites (premotor and motor primary cortex) combined with constraint-induced movement therapy for treatment of stroke patients. Design. Sixty patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups: Group A, anodal stimulation on premotor cortex and constraint-induced movement therapy; Group B, anodal stimulation on primary motor cortex and constraint-induced movement therapy; Group C, sham stimulation and constraint-ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the current study, we hypothesize increased fronto-parietal network connectivity in MEP− stroke survivors would be behaviorally beneficial in those with some residual CST integrity, quantified with FA AI at the level of the cerebral peduncle. There is some preliminary evidence to support the hypothesis that increasing fronto-parietal network connectivity with facilitatory transcranial direct current stimulation to the ipsilesional premotor cortex could benefit motor performance ( Andrade et al, 2017 , Cunningham et al, 2015 ). If upregulation of the ipsilesional fronto-parietal network did promote greater upper-limb behavior, this could suggest a role for interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation treatments or cognitive strategies to engage the fronto-parietal network during training ( Olesen et al, 2004 , Violante et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the current study, we hypothesize increased fronto-parietal network connectivity in MEP− stroke survivors would be behaviorally beneficial in those with some residual CST integrity, quantified with FA AI at the level of the cerebral peduncle. There is some preliminary evidence to support the hypothesis that increasing fronto-parietal network connectivity with facilitatory transcranial direct current stimulation to the ipsilesional premotor cortex could benefit motor performance ( Andrade et al, 2017 , Cunningham et al, 2015 ). If upregulation of the ipsilesional fronto-parietal network did promote greater upper-limb behavior, this could suggest a role for interventions such as non-invasive brain stimulation treatments or cognitive strategies to engage the fronto-parietal network during training ( Olesen et al, 2004 , Violante et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesized that several sub-pathways within the CST would be associated with motor impairment both in the acute and chronic phase. Specifically, we hypothesized that the integrity of fibres descending from primary motor cortex, premotor dorsal cortex and supplementary motor area would show consistent associations with motor impairments, given their functional role and concurrent activation during the execution of voluntary movements 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, there is limited information about the effects of ctDCSM1 UH during the first weeks after stroke when mechanisms of neuroplasticity are more active. Effective rehabilitation strategies delivered in this early phase are deemed pivotal to enhance recovery [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Meta-analyses concluded that ctDCSM1 UH may be beneficial for improvement of upper limb function when delivered in the chronic phase, but not at earlier stages after stroke [8,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%