2021
DOI: 10.1177/10775463211026036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint optimization of nonlinear McPherson suspension system using genetic algorithm and ADAMS software

Abstract: In this article, optimization of the McPherson suspension mechanism of a real car named Arisan is considered. In this regard, a model based on a real-life suspension system is proposed with the least simplification. This model is built in the ADAMS/View software based on the actual size of the suspension mechanism of Arisan. Moreover, the user-written code of the genetic algorithm in C is added as a plug-in to the ADAMS/View software in a completely innovative way to optimize the suspension system. 16 paramete… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the history of active suspension control applications, many approaches have been studied by researchers to improve comfort and ride handling (Ding et al, 2020; Li et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2019; Konoiko et al, 2019; Talib and Darus 2017; Vahedi and Jamali 2021). As a result of the conflicting nature of performance requirements such as comfort, handling, and suspension displacement, a variety of control strategies such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR) (Sam et al, 2000), adaptive sliding control (Chen and Huang 2005), H∞ and robust H ∞ control (Du and Zhang 2007), sliding mode control (SMC) (Akbari et al, 2010), FL (Cózar et al, 2019; Ejegwa et al, 2021; Elbab et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2021), preview control (Oraby et al, 2007), proportional integral (PI) control (Yildiz and Kopmaz 2017), optimal control (Marzbanrad et al, 2002, 2003), and neural network methods (Al-Holou et al, 2002) have been studied to handle with the trade-off performance criteria for active suspension control.…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the history of active suspension control applications, many approaches have been studied by researchers to improve comfort and ride handling (Ding et al, 2020; Li et al, 2020; Liu et al, 2019; Konoiko et al, 2019; Talib and Darus 2017; Vahedi and Jamali 2021). As a result of the conflicting nature of performance requirements such as comfort, handling, and suspension displacement, a variety of control strategies such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR) (Sam et al, 2000), adaptive sliding control (Chen and Huang 2005), H∞ and robust H ∞ control (Du and Zhang 2007), sliding mode control (SMC) (Akbari et al, 2010), FL (Cózar et al, 2019; Ejegwa et al, 2021; Elbab et al, 2009; Xu et al, 2021), preview control (Oraby et al, 2007), proportional integral (PI) control (Yildiz and Kopmaz 2017), optimal control (Marzbanrad et al, 2002, 2003), and neural network methods (Al-Holou et al, 2002) have been studied to handle with the trade-off performance criteria for active suspension control.…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the stability of the waste should be maintained during image collection. In the present study, multi-variable optimization was conducted using the Adams software program [40,41] to shorten the time taken for stabilization of the waste to improve efficiency of the system. Sensitivity analysis was conducted firstly to describe and elucidate the waste separation and sorting mechanisms.…”
Section: Multivariate Optimization Of the Waste Separation And Sortin...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 was established in the Adams software. In order to improve the efficiency of the simulation experiment, the profiling mechanism was simplified when establishing the simulation model (Vahedi et al, 2021). The simplified model consisted of the header, mounting frame, profiled plate and ground.…”
Section: Adams Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%