2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5000077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint Ornstein-Uhlenbeck bridges

Abstract: In this paper, we study the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck bridge process (i.e. the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process conditioned to start and end at fixed points) constraints to have a fixed area under its path. We present both anticipative (in this case, we need the knowledge of the future of the path) and non-anticipative versions of the stochastic process. We obtain the anticipative description thanks to the theory of generalized Gaussian bridges while the non-anticipative representation comes from the theory of stochastic c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods like Doob's h-transform [41] were found intractable due to the conditioning on both X and A [42,43]. An alternative method, proposed for a generalized Brownian bridge [44][45][46], could not be extended to excursions, as it is restricted to Gaussian processes. As we show now, the two large-deviation techniques that describe the two tails of f (ξ), allow one to evaluate p A at small and large A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods like Doob's h-transform [41] were found intractable due to the conditioning on both X and A [42,43]. An alternative method, proposed for a generalized Brownian bridge [44][45][46], could not be extended to excursions, as it is restricted to Gaussian processes. As we show now, the two large-deviation techniques that describe the two tails of f (ξ), allow one to evaluate p A at small and large A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explains the coincidence of the Gaussian fluctuations in this regime, Eqs. ( 17) and (18), with those of a Brownian bridge conditioned on A [45,46].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability that a Brownian motion reaches a level a for the first time at a given time is an event of probability zero. As mentioned in [8,9], conditioning with respect to a set of sample paths of probability zero requires special care. Despite the technical complexities generated by conditioning with such events of zero measure, the resulting diffusion is indeed well defined.…”
Section: Driftless Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the case of the Brownian bridge, where the constraint of returning to zero (or any another value) at a fixed time has clearly a zero measure. Conditioning a subtle object like a diffusion on events of zero probability is not an harmless task [8,9], but this approach is a fruitful method since it sheds light on the important process studied by Krapivsky and Redner but also makes the simulations easy. The next step is to understand when the conditioning is so strong that it erases the original drift of the diffusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we analyze the error in the estimation of the particle density in terms of a finite number of computational particles of finite size, a special case of kernel density estimation, with a focus on the bias-variance tradeoff [25,26]. We also analyze the error in the electric field computed from the charge density, showing that certain negative correlations in the density noise lead to properties of the electric field related to the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck bridge [27][28][29], a generalization of the Brownian bridge [30], a Brownian process with boundary conditions at each end. We concentrate on a 1D (one-dimensional) electrostatic (ES) formulation with periodic boundary conditions, with overall charge neutrality and immobile ions, leaving generalizations such as to higher dimensions and electromagnetic models for future work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%