2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.82.064008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraint-preserving boundary conditions in the3+1first-order approach

Abstract: A set of energy-momentum constraint-preserving boundary conditions is proposed for the first-order Z4 case. The stability of a simple numerical implementation is tested in the linear regime (robust stability test), both with the standard corner and vertex treatment and with a modified finite-differences stencil for boundary points which avoids corners and vertices even in cartesian-like grids. Moreover, the proposed boundary conditions are tested in a strong field scenario, the Gowdy waves metric, showing the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [25] a natural candidate, namely a conformal decomposition of the Z4 formulation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32], Z4c was identified, and indeed found to give favorable results over those of BSSNOK in the context of spherical symmetry. Like that of GHG, the constraint subsystem of the Z4 formulation has a trivial wavelike principal part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25] a natural candidate, namely a conformal decomposition of the Z4 formulation [26][27][28][29][30][31][32], Z4c was identified, and indeed found to give favorable results over those of BSSNOK in the context of spherical symmetry. Like that of GHG, the constraint subsystem of the Z4 formulation has a trivial wavelike principal part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BSSNOK radiation controlling constraint preserving boundary conditions have been proposed [23] but to our knowledge have not been successfully used in numerical applications. With these considerations in mind, a conformal decomposition of the Z4 formulation [24][25][26][27][28][29][30] was proposed in Ref. [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerical studies, see [249, 104, 40, 404, 405, 98, 287, 244, 378, 253, 61, 362, 35, 33, 368, 57, 56], especially [366] and [369] for a comparison between different boundary conditions used in numerical relativity and [365] for a numerical implementation of higher absorbing boundary conditions. For review articles on the IBVP in general relativity, see [372, 355, 435].…”
Section: Boundary Conditions For Einstein’s Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%