2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints of fluid inclusions and in-situ S-Pb isotopic compositions on the origin of the North Kostobe sediment-hosted gold deposit, eastern Kazakhstan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pyrite standard has been utilized for SIMS and LA-MC-ICP-MS sulfur isotope analysis for marcasite in other studies (e.g., Rouxel et al, 2008;Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sims Sulfur Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pyrite standard has been utilized for SIMS and LA-MC-ICP-MS sulfur isotope analysis for marcasite in other studies (e.g., Rouxel et al, 2008;Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: Sims Sulfur Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total S signal obtained for pyrite was typically 1.0-1.2 V. Under these conditions, after a 20 s baseline, 50-60 s of ablation is needed to obtain an internal precision of 34 S/ 32 S ≤ ± 0.000005 (1 SE). Three pyrite standards were used for external standard bracketing (PPP-1) (Gilbert et al, 2014) and quality control (Pyrite1 and Pyrite2 from GSF) of analyses (Wong et al, 2017). The measurement of the in-house Pyrite2 standard during the course of this study yielded the value of δ 34 SCDT (‰) of -0.2 ± 0.5 (1σ, n = 70), which within error is consistent with the reported value of -0.4 ± 0.5 (1σ) measured by gas mass spectrometry (Wong et al, 2017).…”
Section: La-mc-icp-ms Sulfur Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three pyrite standards were used for external standard bracketing (PPP-1) (Gilbert et al, 2014) and quality control (Pyrite1 and Pyrite2 from GSF) of analyses (Wong et al, 2017). The measurement of the in-house Pyrite2 standard during the course of this study yielded the value of δ 34 SCDT (‰) of -0.2 ± 0.5 (1σ, n = 70), which within error is consistent with the reported value of -0.4 ± 0.5 (1σ) measured by gas mass spectrometry (Wong et al, 2017). These pyrite standards were appropriate for calibration of marcasite and even arsenopyrite sulfur isotope analyses (Prendergast et al, 2005), and there was no additional matrix fractionation correction applied for the marcasite herein.…”
Section: La-mc-icp-ms Sulfur Isotope Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 206 Pb/ 204 Pb ratios of the sulfides are distinctly lower than those reported for the mantle ( 206 Pb/ 204 Pb = 18.010; Doe and Zartman, 1979), 207 Pb/ 204 Pb ratios are similar to those of the mantle (<15.600, Shen, 1997), and 208 Pb/ 204 Pb ratios are slightly lower than those of the mantle ( 208 Pb/ 204 Pb = 37.700; Doe and Zartman, 1979). The mantle‐Pb affinity could be attributed to syn/post‐tectonic magmatic activity (e.g., hidden plutons) during the convergence of continental margins (Wong et al ., 2017). Therefore, the measured Pb isotope data suggest that the Pb at Xinfang was primarily sourced from deep magma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%