2019
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggz074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on crustal structure of adjacent OCCs and segment boundaries at 13°N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Abstract: Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policyWhile the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The results of P-wave seismic and gravity modelling along Profile R are reported by Peirce et al (2019a). This 2-D profile also traversed the 3-D tomographic seismic grid acquired over the 13°20'N and 13°30'N OCCs (henceforth referred to as the 1320 and 1330 OCCs - Fig.…”
Section: This Studymentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1). The results of P-wave seismic and gravity modelling along Profile R are reported by Peirce et al (2019a). This 2-D profile also traversed the 3-D tomographic seismic grid acquired over the 13°20'N and 13°30'N OCCs (henceforth referred to as the 1320 and 1330 OCCs - Fig.…”
Section: This Studymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The 13°N segment is bounded to the north by the Fifteen-Twenty FZ, and to the south by the Marathon TF-FZ system, with the Mercurius FZ located ~50 km further south. At the southern ridge-transform intersection, between the 13°N segment and Marathon FZ, there is a prominent inside corner high (Peirce et al, 2019a and references therein). The 1330 OCC lies in the equivalent location of an inside corner with respect to a deviation in trend in ridge axis morphology to its north (Fig.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An assumption implicit to this model, where the deeper trailing sides reflect the isostatic adjustment of a thinner crustal section, is that fracture zones do not become locked at RTIs immediately upon transform-to-fracture zone transition. This assumption is supported by a recent seismic study that indicates vertical movement occurs across the Marathon fracture zone at least until~1 Myr after transition from transform fault to fracture zone (Peirce et al, 2019). It challenges the common view that fracture zones are locked and differential subsidence across them is accommodated by nonisostatic lithospheric flexure instead of vertical slip (e.g., Sandwell & Schubert, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%