2020
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08626-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on Hořava–Lifshitz gravity from GRB 170817A

Abstract: In this work we focus on a toy model: ($$3+1$$ 3 + 1 )-dimensional Hořava–Lifshitz gravity coupling with an anisotropic electromagnetic (EM) field which is generated through a Kaluza-Klein reduction of a ($$4+1$$ 4 + 1 )-dimensional Hořava–Lifshitz gravity. This model exhibits a remarka… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
(255 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because our model recovers the IR action of the BPS model at low energy, as shown in the action (9). The IR behavior of the BPS model is compatible with many current observations, such as binary pulsar [11], gravitational waves [2,13], and binary black hole [15] . However, if λ does not flow to 1 in the IR, General Relativity is not recovered at low energies, and the theory reduces to a LIV gravitational theory, which could be incompatible with current experiments [67].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because our model recovers the IR action of the BPS model at low energy, as shown in the action (9). The IR behavior of the BPS model is compatible with many current observations, such as binary pulsar [11], gravitational waves [2,13], and binary black hole [15] . However, if λ does not flow to 1 in the IR, General Relativity is not recovered at low energies, and the theory reduces to a LIV gravitational theory, which could be incompatible with current experiments [67].…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…It is assumed that the theory will flow to z = 1 in the infrared (IR) region. The Lorentz invariance is violated as z > 1 but it assumes that there is a foliated diffeomorphism invariance with respect to the spatial sector (although the Lorentz invariance has been verified experimentally at sufficiently large scales, it is possible to have a Lorentz invariance violation at high energies (Please see [2] for details). This possibility also has been partially confirmed in some recent experiments, see [3,4] for examples.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These requirements are necessary, since we expect that the pure anisotropic gravity-gauge vector wave zone exits. Then, both the gravitational TT-modes and the T-modes associated with the gauge sector behave as (53) on a gravitational background like (54). Therefore, from the above statements one directly obtains the following estimates on the gravitational and gauge sectors…”
Section: A the Wave Zone Definition Revisitedmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Concerning the experimental challenges, recent detection of gravitational waves [4,5] restricts the coupling parameter α and β (both appearing in the potential in the low energy regime z = 1). Using the data of the GW170817 they find {β ∼ 1, α ∼ 0} [51][52][53], what is more using the data of GRB170817A in a FLRW background in [54] the authors determined that |1 − √ β| < 10 −19 − 10 −18 , thus β ∼ 1. In this regard, the generation of gravitational waves in the Hořava-Lifshitz theory and its properties were analyzed in [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9,36,37] they determined restrictions on the low energy coupling constants of the theory, they must be {β ∼ 1, α ∼ 0}, in requirement to the relativistic observational constraints at low energies. Following the theoretical studies developed in [38,39] where it was proved that in the limit at low energies the gravitational and electromagnetic waves propagate at the same speed √ β, in [40] by using the GRB170817A data within a cosmological FLRW background and placing the theory at the KC point the authors showed that in the most ideal case |1 − √ β| < (10 −19 − 10 −18 ), thus β ∼ 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%