2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.103518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on neutrino mass from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster surveys

Abstract: The presence of massive neutrinos has a characteristic impact on the growth of large scale structures such as galaxy clusters. We forecast on the capability of the number count and power spectrum measured from the ongoing and future Sunyaev-Zeldovich (SZ) cluster surveys, combined with cosmic microwave background (CMB) observation to constrain the total neutrino mass Mν in a flat ΛCDM cosmology. We adopt self-calibration for the mass-observable scaling relation, and evaluate constraints for the South Pole Tele… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of further importance is the different degeneracy direction between structure growth parameters probed by clusters compared to cosmic microwave background (CMB) or Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) which provides compelling joint constraints. This has been demonstrated previously in the literature (for example, Mantz et al 2008;Vikhlinin et al 2009;von der Linden et al 2014;de Haan et al 2016;Salvati et al 2018;Bocquet et al 2019;Zubeldia & Challinor 2019) and the potential of clusters as cosmological probes from future surveys has also been a subject of extensive study (for example, Holder et al 2001;Lima & Hu 2004;Sartoris et al 2012;Mak &Pierpaoli 2013, andrecently Louis &Madhavacheril et al 2017;Cromer et al 2019;Gupta et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Of further importance is the different degeneracy direction between structure growth parameters probed by clusters compared to cosmic microwave background (CMB) or Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) which provides compelling joint constraints. This has been demonstrated previously in the literature (for example, Mantz et al 2008;Vikhlinin et al 2009;von der Linden et al 2014;de Haan et al 2016;Salvati et al 2018;Bocquet et al 2019;Zubeldia & Challinor 2019) and the potential of clusters as cosmological probes from future surveys has also been a subject of extensive study (for example, Holder et al 2001;Lima & Hu 2004;Sartoris et al 2012;Mak &Pierpaoli 2013, andrecently Louis &Madhavacheril et al 2017;Cromer et al 2019;Gupta et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, as a net effect massive neutrinos cause a suppression in the amplitude of the matter power spectrum on small scales with respect to an equivalent massless neutrinos model. The dependence of these effects on the total neutrino mass indicates that astrophysical observations have the potential to provide constraints on the value of Σm ν , as it has been shown by several recent theoretical works (see e. g. Viel et al 2010;Marulli et al 2011;Shimon et al 2012;Carbone 2013;Costanzi Alunno Cerbolini et al 2013;Mak & Pierpaoli 2013;Roncarelli et al 2015;Palanque-Delabrouille et al 2015). In fact, the list of cosmological probes that can be used to place limits on the sum of neutrino masses is nowadays long and heterogeneous, including galaxy redshift surveys (Elgarøy et al 2002;Tegmark et al 2006;Thomas et al 2010), galaxy clustering (Saito et al 2011;Zhao et al 2013;Beutler et al 2014;Sánchez et al 2014), cosmic microwave background (CMB) observations from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP; Komatsu et al 2009Komatsu et al , 2011Hinshaw et al 2013) and Planck (Planck Collaboration XIII 2016), Ly-α forest studies (Croft et al 1999;Viel et al 2010;Palanque-Delabrouille et al 2015), galaxy clusters mass function (Mantz et al 2010(Mantz et al , 2015 and future 21cm intensity mapping observations (Villaescusa-Navarro et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Besides these, the tSZ effect is also one of the most efficient methods used for detecting galaxy clusters (see catalogs from Bleem et al 2015;Planck Collaboration et al srinirag@illinois.edu 2016a; Hilton et al 2020;Huang et al 2020;Bleem et al 2020). The abundance of clusters as a function of mass and redshift can also place tight constraints on the parameters that govern structure formation and geometry of the Universe (Holder et al 2001;Lima & Hu 2004;Allen et al 2011;Sartoris et al 2012;Mak & Pierpaoli 2013) like, for example, dark energy equation of state w 0 , normalization of the matter power spectrum σ 8 , and the sum of neutrino masses m ν as demonstrated using data (recently by Zubeldia & Challinor 2019;Bocquet et al 2019;Planck Collaboration et al 2020;To et al 2021;Costanzi et al 2021;Mantz et al 2021;Salvati et al 2021). Thanks to its redshift independent nature (Sunyaev & Zel'dovich 1970), the tSZ effect allows us to detect clusters at high redshifts where the signal-tonoise (S/N) of other cluster observables like richness estimates or X-ray flux drop rapidly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%