2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac2947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from their impact on the ionization history with Planck 2018

Abstract: We update and extend our previous CMB anisotropy constraints on primordial magnetic fields through their dissipation by ambipolar diffusion and MHD decaying turbulence effects on the post-recombination ionization history. We derive the constraints using the latest Planck 2018 data release which improves on the E-mode polarization leading to overall tighter constraints with respect to Planck 2015. We also use the low-multipole E-mode polarization likelihood obtained by the SROLL2 map making algorithm and we not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is reflected in the constraints we obtain and shown in table 6 and in two-dimensional contours in figure 15. With respect to current constraints from Planck data (in parentheses in the table) [181], we find that with LiteBIRD sensitivities we are capable of improving the constraints for negative n B . This is due to the shape of the MHD decaying turbulence effect.…”
Section: Magneto-hydrodynamics Decaying Turbulencementioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is reflected in the constraints we obtain and shown in table 6 and in two-dimensional contours in figure 15. With respect to current constraints from Planck data (in parentheses in the table) [181], we find that with LiteBIRD sensitivities we are capable of improving the constraints for negative n B . This is due to the shape of the MHD decaying turbulence effect.…”
Section: Magneto-hydrodynamics Decaying Turbulencementioning
confidence: 83%
“…We use the extension developed and optimized in refs. [178,180,181], with the same settings as in ref. [181], of the Recfast++ routine within the CosmoRec code [226].…”
Section: Jcap07(2024)086mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leading constraint on this parameter is B 1Mpc 1.2 nG for a nearly scale-invariant PMF, derived from a combination of Planck and SPT two-point power spectra (Zucca et al 2017). Through the effect of PMFs on the postrecombination ionization history, Paoletti et al (2022) were able to constrain the amplitude of the magnetic fields to < B 0.69 nG 2 . The A CB constraint derived from BICEP3 95 GHz alone (A CB 0.097) is comparable to the upper limits from SPT and ACT, but the resulting constraint on B 1Mpc is considerably better because of the advantage of the lower-frequency leverage with the ν −2 scaling.…”
Section: Constraints On Pmfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic fields exist in various scales of the Universe, from planets, stars, and galaxies [1,2], to clusters of galaxies [3] and remote protogalactic clouds. The absence of blazar halos implies magnetic fields with a magnitude B > 10 −16 G on Mpc to Gpc scales or B > 10 −15 G on kpc scales [4], while the anisotropy and polarization of the cosmic microwave background imposes an upper bound of ∼ 10 −9 G on Mpc scales [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%