2011
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONSTRAINTS ON QUASAR LIFETIMES AND BEAMING FROM THE He II Lyα FOREST

Abstract: We show that comparisons of He ii Lyα forest lines of sight to nearby quasar populations can strongly constrain the lifetimes and emission geometry of quasars. By comparing the He ii and H i Lyα forests along a particular line of sight, one can trace fluctuations in the hardness of the radiation field (which are driven by fluctuations in the He ii ionization rate). Because this high-energy background is highly variable-thanks to the rarity of the bright quasars that dominate it and the relatively short attenua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the fiducial parameters above, nH,out(R = 100 kpc) = 2 × 10 −4 cm −3 , so reaching a characteristic LLS density of nH ≈ 0.01 cm −3 requires clumping by a factor ∼ 50. The time for gas ejected from the galaxy to travel a distance R is t flow = R/vout ≈ 10 8 yr R 100 kpc v 1, 000 km s −1 −1 , (5) which for the fiducial parameters is comparable to the estimated lifetime of quasars (e.g., Martini 2004;Hopkins et al 2005;Furlanetto & Lidz 2011). Thus, quasars can in principle eject in their halos enough cool gas to explain the LLSs observed around them.…”
Section: Quasar-hosting Halosmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the fiducial parameters above, nH,out(R = 100 kpc) = 2 × 10 −4 cm −3 , so reaching a characteristic LLS density of nH ≈ 0.01 cm −3 requires clumping by a factor ∼ 50. The time for gas ejected from the galaxy to travel a distance R is t flow = R/vout ≈ 10 8 yr R 100 kpc v 1, 000 km s −1 −1 , (5) which for the fiducial parameters is comparable to the estimated lifetime of quasars (e.g., Martini 2004;Hopkins et al 2005;Furlanetto & Lidz 2011). Thus, quasars can in principle eject in their halos enough cool gas to explain the LLSs observed around them.…”
Section: Quasar-hosting Halosmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, to ionize the gas, the quasar had to emit He iiionizing photons at least for the transverse light crossing time between the foreground quasar and the sightline (e.g. Jakobsen et al 2003;Worseck & Wisotzki 2006;Furlanetto & Lidz 2011). If we assume a simple lightbulb model in which the quasar turns on, shines with constant luminosity for some time and turns off again, it had to shine for at least the light crossing time to allow simultaneous observation of the quasar and the additional Figure 7) while the two others only include quasars above a minimum separation of Dprop > 15 Mly and > 25 Mly.…”
Section: Constraining the Quasar Episodic Lifetime Withmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since quasar orientation is random and only constrained to be unobscured towards Earth, one can in any case only expect a probabilistic answer (see e.g. Furlanetto & Lidz 2011). Determining how realistic it might be that three out of four foreground quasars do not illuminate the background sightline is an important question for future work.…”
Section: Absence Of Transmission Spikes For Largementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations