2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the identity of the dark matter from strong gravitational lenses

Abstract: Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only limited data are currently available in these regimes. The gravitational lensing techniques pioneered by Koopmans (2005) and Vegetti & Koopmans (2009) may be used to constrain the subhalo mass function directly, potentially distinguishing WDM from CDM (Li et al 2015). By increasing the sample of strong lensing systems, upcoming telescopes such as the SKA and LSST could play a major role in constraining the nature of the dark matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only limited data are currently available in these regimes. The gravitational lensing techniques pioneered by Koopmans (2005) and Vegetti & Koopmans (2009) may be used to constrain the subhalo mass function directly, potentially distinguishing WDM from CDM (Li et al 2015). By increasing the sample of strong lensing systems, upcoming telescopes such as the SKA and LSST could play a major role in constraining the nature of the dark matter.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, the line-of-sight and substructure contributions can be calculated by integrating the halo and subhalo mass functions from the lowest detectable mass M low (which is set by the observational sensitivity and angular resolution) to the highest possible mass for a dark clump. Here, we use equation (20) to convert the integration limit M low = M PJ tot into an effective NFW mass, and then we use equation (18) to evolve the latter with redshift, and thus obtain an effective M low (z) for line-of-sight haloes (as already pointed out by Li et al 2016b). In Section 4.1, we show how to integrate the (sub)halo mass function and give some examples of the total number of detectable (sub)haloes for specific combinations of lens and source redshift.…”
Section: Quantifying the Line-of-sight Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximately a few hundred high quality strong lens systems would suffice to rule out either the 7 keV sterile neutrino model or CDM itself [360]. Very high resolution imaging is the primary requirement, either in the optical or UV, or using interferometry at submillimeter and longer wavelengths [354].…”
Section: Astrophysical Tests Of the Nature Of The Dark Mattermentioning
confidence: 99%