2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.96.065805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the nuclear equation of state from nuclear masses and radii in a Thomas-Fermi meta-modeling approach

Abstract: The question of correlations among empirical equation of state (EoS) parameters constrained by nuclear observables is addressed in a fully empirical meta-modeling approach. A recently proposed meta-modeling for the nuclear EoS in nuclear matter, is augmented with a single finite size term to produce a minimal unified EoS functional able to describe the smooth part of the nuclear ground state properties. This meta-model can reproduce the predictions of a large variety of models, and interpolate continuously bet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I of Ref. [143]). So, as expected, this strategy is equivalent to a direct fit of the parameters of the nuclear effective interaction as it is commonly done in EDFs.…”
Section: Edfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table I of Ref. [143]). So, as expected, this strategy is equivalent to a direct fit of the parameters of the nuclear effective interaction as it is commonly done in EDFs.…”
Section: Edfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e average values of the empirical parameters and their uncertainties are estimated based on experimental and theoretical nuclear physics constraints. In follow-up studies meta-modeling was used to study the e ects of uncertainties in the empirical parameters on NS properties [9], nite size e ects in the description of nuclear masses and radii of ground state nuclei [10], and to compute correlations between empirical parameters from known constraints [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With increasing magnetic fields, it departs strongly from the TOV solution. As was already pointed out in [57,96], this is mainly due to the pure magnetic field contribution and not that of the effect of the magnetised EoS. The other main difference is that for the isotropic TOV calculations, the pure field contribution is a constant, whereas that of the full numerical computation is a profile, generated via a current function.…”
Section: Effect On Radius and Crust-core Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Employing this method, mass-radius relations of magnetised neutron stars were calculated for full numerical solutions. The unified EoSs for describing both the crust and the core were constructed within the same "Meta-Model" scheme [94,96,97,98]. The magnetic field dependence is only included within the core EoS, assuming a non-magnetised crust.…”
Section: Effect On Radius and Crust-core Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%