2014
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/l12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the Physical Properties of Main Belt Comet P/2013 R3 From Its Breakup Event

Abstract: Jewitt et al. (2014) recently reported that main belt comet P/2013 R3 experienced a breakup, probably due to rotational disruption, with its components separating on mutually hyperbolic orbits. We propose a technique for constraining physical properties of the proto-body, especially the initial spin period and cohesive strength, as a function of the body's estimated size and density. The breakup conditions are developed by combining mutual orbit dynamics of the

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
7
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to find answers, we have used the above described simulation method and set up, and have ran simulations with granular systems with particle-particle tensile strength values of that cover the range of bond number failure types. All of these values are well within the accepted values of tensile strength for observed small NEOs (Holsapple, 2004(Holsapple, , 2010Scheeres et al, 2010;Sánchez and Scheeres, 2014;Rozitis et al, 2014;Hirabayashi et al, 2014;. In general we find that the polar regions of a rapidly rotating body will preferentially retain loose regolith, even in the cohesionless case as previously pointed out in Scheeres (2015); Yu et al (2018) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In order to find answers, we have used the above described simulation method and set up, and have ran simulations with granular systems with particle-particle tensile strength values of that cover the range of bond number failure types. All of these values are well within the accepted values of tensile strength for observed small NEOs (Holsapple, 2004(Holsapple, , 2010Scheeres et al, 2010;Sánchez and Scheeres, 2014;Rozitis et al, 2014;Hirabayashi et al, 2014;. In general we find that the polar regions of a rapidly rotating body will preferentially retain loose regolith, even in the cohesionless case as previously pointed out in Scheeres (2015); Yu et al (2018) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…To emphasize that sublimation is unable to expel particles from the nucleus against inter-particle cohesion, we plot solutions for the sublimation gas pressure from Equation (7) as a function of heliocentric distance in Figure (9). The Figure shows a slightly higher sublimation pressure for CO (solid red curve) than for CO 2 (dashed blue curve), as expected from the greater volatility of CO. Also shown in Figure (9) are two estimates of the cohesive strength inferred for lunar regolith dust (Mitchell et al 1974, Scott andZuckerman 1971), for the fragmented active asteroid P/2013 R3 (Jewitt et al 2014, 2017b, Hirabayashi et al 2014) and for split comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 (Asphaug and Benz 1996), together with strength estimates from Equation (10) for three particle sizes. The sublimation gas pressures, even of CO, are 2 to 3 orders of magnitude too small to overcome the interparticle cohesion in the Sanchez and Scheeres (2014) model, and 4 to 6 orders of magnitude smaller than cohesive strengths measured in the regolith of the Moon, or inferred from break-up of P/2013 R3 and SL9.…”
Section: The Cohesion Bottleneckmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disruption events represent opportunities to probe the structure and composition of asteroid interiors that are difficult to study otherwise (e.g., Bodewits et al 2014;Hirabayashi et al 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%