2014
DOI: 10.1130/g35926.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Constraints on the recent rate of lunar ejecta breakdown and implications for crater ages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
103
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
103
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, individual ejecta clasts deposited at larger ranges are not expected to be part of the bulk of a thicker deposit, but would be deposited at the surface or quite shallowly mixed into preexisting regolith (e.g., Oberbeck, 1975). We reiterate that the importance of subsurface clasts to the CPR evolution of initially rock-rich ejecta has been suggested previously (e.g., Bandfield et al, 2011;Ghent et al, 2014Ghent et al, , 2016, but our data provide independent support for this hypothesis. Nearer to the rim, where R~1 to 1.5, ejecta thicknesses are multiple meters, rocks are buried during ejecta emplacement in this thicker deposit, and partially shielded from the destructive environment at the surface.…”
Section: Cpr Enhancement In Crater Ejectasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, individual ejecta clasts deposited at larger ranges are not expected to be part of the bulk of a thicker deposit, but would be deposited at the surface or quite shallowly mixed into preexisting regolith (e.g., Oberbeck, 1975). We reiterate that the importance of subsurface clasts to the CPR evolution of initially rock-rich ejecta has been suggested previously (e.g., Bandfield et al, 2011;Ghent et al, 2014Ghent et al, , 2016, but our data provide independent support for this hypothesis. Nearer to the rim, where R~1 to 1.5, ejecta thicknesses are multiple meters, rocks are buried during ejecta emplacement in this thicker deposit, and partially shielded from the destructive environment at the surface.…”
Section: Cpr Enhancement In Crater Ejectasupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Using the rock abundance signature of the ejecta from Copernican‐age lunar craters D > 5 km derived from the Diviner instrument on LRO as a proxy for age (Ghent et al. ), Mazrouei et al. () and Ghent et al.…”
Section: Impact Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermophysical mapping by the LRO Diviner thermal radiometer revealed that Sosigenes and several other IMPs had much lower rock abundances than the ejecta of some late Copernican‐aged craters (e.g., ~170 Ma Aristarchus and ~85 Ma Tycho, actually only slightly higher than typical lunar surfaces; Ghent et al. ) and an interpreted surface regolith layer thicker than 10 cm, suggesting that either lunar IMPs were older than the crater‐count dating results, or there was an unusually rapid development of regolith materials on IMPs compared with blocky ejecta blankets (Elder et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%